STRYD Tests: Varying Terrains & Speeds

stryd

STRYD – Running Power

More tests today. Here are some results and inferences.

Test 1: Flat, constant speed, Varying surfaces

  • Tarmac: 3:59/km, 260w
  • Firm track: 3:53/km, 260w
  • Grass, mildly soft: 3:59/km, 264w

My Inferences: Surface appears not to be taken into account.

Test 2: How does power increase with pace? Exactly the same external conditions for each interval.

  • 3:20/km, 269w
  • 3:41/km, 263w
  • 3:45/km, 258w
  • 4:09/km, 256w
  • 4:36/km, 239w
  • 4:42/km, 242w (?)
STRYD: Power vs Pace

STRYD: Power vs Pace

My Inferences: Looks fairly linear to me. [I had the pleasure of Dr Andrew Coggan confirming to me on a forum that this should be expected in normal power ranges as VO2 increases linearly with speed/pace]. I would not have thought that, so it’s always good to learn.

Test 3: Extended Uphill – same gradient (relatively gentle but enough to slow us all down) and wind, different surface

  • TARMAC – 4:24/km, 280w
  • SOFT, BUMPY GRASS – 4:25/km, 270w

My Inferences: Looks wrong to me. Possible some element of my technique may have changed??

Test 4: Medium Downhill (relatively gentle), sheltered, different surfaces.

  • TARMAC – 3:18/km, 275w
  • SOFT, BUMPY GRASS – 3:23/km, 281w

My Inferences: Inconclusive. Initially I thought that this looks wrong but possibly correct. I would have expected much more power required as ground was soft. Yet I ran slightly slower and required 6w more on the bumpy grass. BUT had I ran at 3:18/km/h on the bumpy grass then maybe the watts would have been a fair bit more +10w? That would then look more sensible I guess.

 

 

 

 

2
Leave a Reply here

avatar
1 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
Race LeaderJavier De Pedro Ormeño Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Javier De Pedro Ormeño
Guest

Hello,

How much lasted the test stimulus?

Good article!!