Sports Watches: What are the killer apps/functions for 2017 and beyond?

Source: ehealthnews

Source: ehealthnews

With the Fenix 5, the killer “app” will be MAPS and the gargantuan, cumulative effect of a shed-load of individually-trivial functionality.

Think about it though…

In the market for devices for casual runners, this MAPPING feature is worthless.

So there are lots of different killer functions and apps for sports watches depending on the segment targeted. There is also a trickle down effect where one year’s high-end function on an expensive watch gets passed down to a lower model in subsequent years. 2016 saw optical HR doing this whereas in 2014/5 it was decent smartphone notifications and before that activity tracking; and so on into the past.

In cycling, Garmin are integrating with in-ride sensors and functions; Group Tracking and Varia lights, for example, as well as integrating automated bits of gadgetry like heads-up displays and gear shifting. Of course also integrating with STRAVA and other ‘social’ and performance functions – these are also ‘killer’ features to varying degrees.

Here are some ‘attractive areas’ for the future, no doubt there are many more for the list. These are potentially SIGNIFICANTLY LARGE IMHO:

  1. Untethered music – this will appeal to many segments. This is happening NOW in 2016/17.
  2. New sensor types eg hydration from BSX’s LVL.  But rather integrating such a sensor type within, for example, an existing oHR chip or putting a new sensor type into a watch. So  rather than ‘an optical sensor array’ you would have ‘an optical hr and hydration sensor array’
  3. Running power (currently only on STRYD, yes I know there are sceptics out there)
  4. MAPPING – ever heard of Google Maps? It’ll never catch on, I’m sure 🙂
  5. HRV based training: used holistically and making it work properly ie MUCH more than what Garmin have done so far; and Garmin already do more than most.
  6. More and better smartphone integration – eg integration with other smartphone apps/widgets via AndroidWear/WatchOS
  7. Fashionable ‘proper’ sports devices

Of course there will always be new, highly-specific, bits and pieces but I wouldn’t class those as ‘killer’ apps/functions/hardware eg a more sensitive HRM might sway some people but not many. those are MUCH more targeted bits of functionality for smaller market segments.

There are other gadget areas bandied about as potentially important, like ‘hearables’ and devices built into rings. I’m sceptical about a lot of this stuff, at least in their current technical incarnations. Yes a Bluetooth earbud that also doubles as an accurate optical HR sensor is great but that is 2015 not 2017; nothing new needs to go in an earbud other than that. There are also things that are of interest to me personally like Muscle Oxygenation or Gait analysis – but I doubt the mass markets exist for those.

 

Leave a Reply here

Be the First to Comment!

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Justin
Member

You used gargantuan. Glad to have been of help sir 🙂

Justin
Member
I want to add that there is no single product for someone like me on the market. The fenix line ticks off most of the boxes, but really it does most of the things I want really and barely supports the other things I do. For example: I primally do 6day/wk HIIT Training year long(Former: Gamma Focus T25, current: Insanity max 30). This does well for me since I live in the Upper Midwest of the U.S. and i’m frozen indoors for most of the year (example it was 1 above yesterday– -22 with windchill, i’m not going out there for anything). When the ice sheets eventually recede for the year, I hit my hometown’s many trails to run/cycle. I don’t switch my focus to these things, instead I opt out a 1, maybe 2 workouts for this. either 5k or 10k takes one day, the other being a 25-50 mile bike ride (trust me when I say it’s a brutal ride, the elevation climbs in my area are pretty nuts). Through all this, the higher end watches like the Fenix cover nearly everything I need. The advance run metrics with the HRM-Tri have truly helped me fix my running… Read more »
Heri
Guest

Someone should work on training plans provided by Garmin and other companies. They provide a set of training plans but I don’t think they all fit the millions of people who are using the watches. What I see is that these watches generate massive amounts of data (heart rate every sec, temperature, gps localization, running dynamics, performance data etc.). In my case, Garmin Connect also gets my weight and other data from other apps. What about going through all of these data and see what works best?

Justin
Member
There are lots of external training plans out there. The Garmin plans are so unappealing to me that other than this post, I have put them out of mind. Not to mention I’d kill for a solid 12 week period where I could follow ANY of their programs (weather does not play well for me. Why do I live here?) For me, i’ve had to balence in-home programs (part out of necessity, mostly because I hate gyms) with taking advantage of great outdoor weather when I can (which is a smaller window) And don’t get me wrong, What I do works well for me. I’m not training for an event, or to show off. I do what I do for health and pushing my limits. I compete with myself. All my vitals are solid, and have been for years. What I need (and partially found) with Sport Watches/external sensors is how to get the finer detail to improve at whatever I do. The run dynamics from the HRM-TRI last summer…made me a much better runner, couple that with other training activities I did/do, I pushed my health even higher, not to mention not getting hurt from poor form. I just… Read more »