Best Cycling WATCH 2018 | Recommendation | Top 10 GPS Review | Comparison

If you are treating yourself or a loved one to a new GPS wrist watch and want to buy them the Best Cycling WATCH then you’ve come to the right place for the latest recommendations. Luckily for you, it’s a great time to buy a great cycling WATCH. At the mid- to lower end of the pricing there are many feature-full models to choose from and further up the pricing scale there are many technical innovations taking place for more serious tech-cyclists. There are also now some 2 year old models that are still surprisingly good, awesome even, and falling in price to more sensible levels as replacement versions are released.

Best Cycling Watch Garmin Fenix 5X 5 5S Forerunner 935 Review

It’s hard to determine the absolute best cycling watch for everyone. On the flip side, most cycling needs are covered by very many watches.

Skip ahead to the main sections…


I’m going to cover devices from $100/£100 and upwards to the high-end cycling watches at over £/Eu/$500. You are lucky in that this year there are many well-featured watches with all the key bits of functionality even at the very lower end of that price range.

I’m going to recommend the best devices for the kinds of usage you might put them to. If you are looking for a recommendation to fit within a price range then that’s not what I am doing here, sorry. What’s the point in buying the best watch in your budget if you can’t do what you want it to??

I think you may well be surprised though at some of the ‘bargain’ prices in some of the categories.

Here are the categories and, hopefully, you might be able to best fit yourself into just one of them. This post is written in a lighthearted way, BUT the recommendations ARE SERIOUS.

Categories and Special Categories


Having considered those categories, I suspect that most of you will want your cycling watch to do other things as well. Let’s face it, if you are JUST cycling then your best option is to get a handlebar-mounted cycling computer. Those recommendations would be TOTALLY different and are covered in the Best Cycling Computer review.


Apple? Fitbit? Suunto? Garmin? Polar? Apple? Lezyne? TomTom? I’ve looked at very many devices. If you can see a photo that looks like it’s been taken by me then …it has and I REALLY have used that device.

Best Cycling Watch with GPS

A standalone device or an app or a watch?

It’s complicated.

These recommendations only look at cycling WATCHES not smartphone apps. The argument FOR using your smartphone for cyling ARE compelling.

STRAVA is the popular & obvious choice for an app to use on your smartphone. There is a free version which is good and perfectly usable as well as a premium version offering some more features. If you are buying a high-end cycling computer then often you will also need a PAID-FOR STRAVA account to benefit from some of the innovative features. A year’s subscription to STRAVA PREMIUM can be a good present for a keen cyclist. You could maybe also look at ridewithgps, WAHOO Fitness or sportrstracker (Suunto/Amer). Once you’ve searched for those, similar ones will come up in your app store.

All cycling watches will be able to be handlebar mounted or worn on the wrist. Watch screens are generally quite small and not ideal for navigation, especially when on the wrist. Indeed the practicality of a wrist-worn watch is that you will have to turn your wrist and look slightly sideways to see the screen. A cycling computer/head unit is a generally better option. Even your smartphone, when handlebar mounted, is a better option with a LARGE screen and access to live cellular-based services.


To ‘train well’ you will probably consider distance, time, power, speed, cadence and heart rate. However, the 3 key features you should look for as a minimum are the ability to support:

  • GPS
  • Heart Rate (but optical HR will be POOR when cycling)
  • Cadence

Most watches will meet those criteria, sometimes bundled with a couple of sensors.


I tend to assume that you are ‘training’. However, I’m sure MANY of you will NOT be ‘training’ and will want a cycling watch for many other reasons like commuting, smartphone notifications, activity tracking and pure recreation. So…

Other key feature sets cover

  • Power meter support (for serious training and many will also deliver cadence)
  • Barometric Altimeter (for those who are concerned with metres climbed)
  • Navigation (for those who want to explore and those who want a BikeNav and those who want to follow simple routes)
  • Speed / Cadence (I prefer separate speed/cadence sensors)
  • Durability (for MTB or commuting usage)
  • Connectivity to special sensors: brake lights, proximity radar; and night lights
  • Workouts and Intervals
  • Aesthetics
  • Connectivity to other people
  • Connectivity to other services both in-ride (weather, STRAVA) or post-ride (STRAVA, TrainingPeaks)
  • Connectivity to apps, sensors and wifi

Within each feature SET there will be many, many individual features – WAY too numerous to cover here.

The following list of recommendations links to individual cycling device reviews – there you will find the detailed features that I have taken into account when making the recommendation.


Winner – Lezyne Enhanced Micro C GPS Watch (Review)

Lezyne Micro C GPS WatchNeither of us are Nicolas Vouilloz but we still want a device that won’t fall apart at the sight of either a splash of rain or distant tree root.

Lezyne’s MICRO C IS a watch but it does somewhat resemble a cycling computer plus a strap!

It is sturdier than most alternatives. It supports power meters;ANT+ and BLE sensors; and GLONASS and, if you check out the Lezyne feature table, below, you will see it has a VERY wide rage of features.

The main downside is the small size, but you are here because you wanted a watch and they are all pretty small! The screen is not always great in all light conditions. On the flip side the rectangular screen and the ability to increase the size of some of the data on display improves readability.

If you read my Lezyne Micro C Watch review (link to: you will see I had a few issues when the device was initially released. Firmware improvements released since then has meant I can let the MICRO C sneak onto this list.


The Lezyne range IS confusingly similar. This might help

The Micro C WATCH is the only WATCH that Lezyne make.

  • Positives – Compelling feature set at a low price.
  • Negatives – Aesthetics and a slightly ‘boxy’ form.


Winner – Garmin Fenix 3 (Review)

Like the Mountain Biker you want a degree of durability in your choice. Yet, by definition, you are cycling into work and so this cycling watch might need to stay on your wrist all day.

OK, OK. You don’t like the look of the Lezyne watch. I hear you.

You still want something a bit rugged? With a few features, half-decent GPS and reasonable navigation. Then you buy the Garmin Fenix 3 (three, not 5) which is cheaper and generally works better…you’ll see the Fenix 5 range ‘superseded’ soon by the 5plus range. ie the ones that work, treat yourself to one of those later in 2018.

Suunto Spartan Ultra vs Garmin Fenix3

The Suunto Spartan ULTRA is another beast of a watch and I personally prefer its looks for the office. Most of the Suunto

SPARTANs will also be a good choice for you but you might want to consider one of the custom-built versions with a bit extra durability in the case. That will cost you a little more. If you have sensors on more than one bike then the Suunto is a bit of a faff as you will have to continually re-pair them as you switch bikes; you might avoid the Suunto for that reason alone.

  • Positives – Compelling feature set, prices are lowering.
  • Negatives – Rugged aesthetics and quite large when wrist-worn.

ESSENTIAL READING: Garmin Fenix 3 Review


Best REI/Wiggle/PMC price is linked to. Prices approx $330/Eu310/£329 and UNlikely to fall below 300 in 2018.


Winner – Suunto SPARTAN BARO (Review)

You want a good shot at getting decent altitude and decent GPS. Don’t forget whatever you wear on your wrist WON’T get decent HR when cycling, so you can forget that. However, the SPARTAN SPORT BARO has got market-leading GPS accuracy and a clever little barometer which meshes barometric altimetry with GPS altimetry. They call it FusedAlti.

Suunto Spartan Baro Review

If you’re following a route then the SPARTAN SPORT BARO is OK for that but following pretty much any route on any device is limited by the small size of the watch face and the bounces of the road/track.

  • Positives – Great build quality and quality internal components to deliver accuracy.
  • Negatives – Rugged aesthetics and quite large when wrist-worn. Lack of sensor pool. No ANT+ support.
Best REI/Wiggle/PMC price is linked to. Prices are $510/£450/Eur450 and will vary regularly.




Winner Garmin Forerunner 935 (Review)

You have N+1 bikes and Y+1 power meters where N>Y. How many cadence sensors do you have? You probably lost count, I know. You’re not bothered about optical HR as you know it’s rubbish and you have numerous HR straps instead; including Garmin’s HRM-TRI (review) which you know will cache your HR even when you are having a ‘comfort break’ behind a tree.. you simply can’t miss any data for ANY reason. You’ll need the 935 to retrieve the cached HR data.

To be able to cope with lots of bike sensors you will need a watch that has a sensor pool. And you know which one has that? yep…the 935.

L-to-R Suunto Spartan, 935, 5s, Epson 810

X & Y (above) are now both in double figures and so you might splash out on some other mindless bike tech. Varia lights or Di2 should fit that need nicely. Again, they’ll work with the 935.

Did I mention STRAVA LIVE SEGMENTS? No. Of course, you guessed it, it does those too. It does everything. Almost….

The downside to the 935 is that it is quite lightweight and not as rugged as other watches. It also only has ‘line’ maps rather than the ‘proper’ map of the Fenix 5X. The Fenix 5X and 935 are pretty much otherwise identical. Both of them inhabit Tech City. Maybe they rule tech city?

power meter city
10% Discount Coupon ‘the5krunner10’ or 10% credit for Garmin products

I like the 935. It works. You can get a 10% store credit and a great price from PowerMeterCity in the USA and you help this blog a little too. Thank you.


  • Positives – Vast feature set.
  • Negatives – Price. Some of the internal components are not as accurate as they should be at this price..



Winner – Garmin Forerunner 920XT

In reality, the Tri-Racer would also buy the Garmin Forerunner 935 if they could afford it. However, the tri-racer may well be a bit of a purist and realise that the 935 does so much that its menu system challenges Professor Stephen Hawking.

The tri-racer may well opt for the cheaper Garmin Forerunner 920XT (review) or maybe the prettier and smaller Garmin Forerunner 735XT (Review). They will both ‘do’ triathlon very nicely, thank you very much.

Garmin Forerunner 920XT Review vs Garmin Forerunner 735XT Review Comparison

The 920Xt is a bit ugly but it was my ‘staple’, when it came to a tri watch. Both the 735XT and 920XT have some more modern feature and app capabilities missing but they also have a few hundred dollars missing from the price tag too. Both are perfectly sensible choices.

  • Positives – Good build quality and feature set
  • Negatives – Ugly.
Best REI/Wiggle/PMC price is linked to. Prices vary seasonally from $450/£400 to $250/£220. .


Winner – Apple Watch 3

Sporty, gadgety people like me will sneer at the Apple Watch. After all, it cannot really be a proper sports watch and cycling definitely is a sport.

Fitbit Ionic Garmin Vivoactive 3 Apple Watch

However, Mr Gore’s unfortunate truth applies here too. The Apple Watch is a pretty good sports watch and a pretty good cycling watch too. Unfortunately.

It can be worn for work or pleasure. Though perhaps not rugged pleasure.

If the app isn’t already on the device there’s a pretty good chance someone will have already developed it for you for the exorbitant price of $1.99.

The Apple Watch still has the same optical HR issues that everyone else has when cycling. Apple really are not that much more wonderful at designing bits of hardware than anyone else.

Apple’s GPS and altimetry are NOT as good as the likes of Suunto but Apple’s GPS is as good as many Garmins…even some of the higher-end ones. And that’s despite what your friend says. Really it’s true. Unfortunately.

Probably the main downside is the battery life but the Apple Watch 3 has made some steps forwards on that front compared to the previous version and also has an inbuilt eSIM chip for cellular access and all that comes with that eg mapping.

The other downside, while I think about it, is that some people REALLY don’t like Apple products. A good way to tell is by looking at their phone. If they have an Apple Phone you know you are on to a winner with the Watch as a present. You know what to do. Miss Visa should help.

  • Positives – Aesthetics, two sizes to cover smaller wrists, app store.
  • Negatives – Battery life. No ANT+ support. Probably best if you are already an Apple adherent.

power meter city
10% Discount with coupon code ‘the5krunner10’ or 10% store credit for Garmin


Reader-Powered Content

This content is not sponsored. It’s mostly me behind the labour of love which is this site and I appreciate everyone who follows, subscribes or Buys Me A Coffee ❤️ Alternatively please buy the reviewed product from my partners. Thank you! FTC: Affiliate Disclosure: Links pay commission. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

8 thoughts on “Best Cycling WATCH 2018 | Recommendation | Top 10 GPS Review | Comparison

  1. “The other downside, while I think about it, is that some people REALLY don’t like Apple products. A good way to tell is by looking at their phone. If they have an Apple Phone you know you are on to a winner with the Watch as a present. You know what to do.”

    If Apple weren’t so lockdown across their hardware ecosystem (anything north of $200) you’d see more people mixing and matching hardware, but apple mandates you use their watch with their phone and their ecosystem of programs/aps.

    Personally, I used Windows early on in my life, which didn’t/doesn’t play well with Apple (Have you ever tried using iTunes for Windows?), then went to Android as if worked just fine with Windows. I’m so far invested in that ecosystem it would be silly to turn around and move to Apple products.

    Still, the biggest grievance I will have with Apple is simply this; they charge a premium for their products and the product is slightly above average at best. The cost is out of step with the product, not to mention the innards are usually behind the curve of most other companies for the year (usually a generation behind or more). Couple that with shoddy production runs (iphone X breaks in one fall, iphone 8 can get waterlogged and die) and there you have it.

    Samsung is no better, but Samsung is laughing all the way to the bank as it has not only it’s own line of successful phones and watches….but it’s the biggest chip supplier for Apple and the iPhone. Perhaps the killer app all these smartwatches need is.

    Broad. External. Sensor. Support.

    1. yeah maybe
      many samsungs support ant+ and i think other phones have the necessary hardware (probably some support ant+ too, i haven’t checked)
      i do have itunes working on window tho 😉 … well soemone in my family does.

  2. They say you learn something new every-day, well Today I learn there are different watches for cycling with different functionalities.
    I’m more of a BMX’ Fan to be fair
    I use your average Casio G-Shock watch, however after discovering there’s more suitable one’s i Looked online and discovered a massive savings range! Everything seems to be discounted from it’s original price.
    What’s your opinion?

  3. V800 from polar is still best in class if it comes to gps accuracy. IMO function wise better than Lezyne, and you can wear it all day. It’s kinda forgotten just because it had been released years ago, but while I was trying to justify buying new watch I was always struggling finding real improvement…

      1. the only thing i found annoying is their approach to power meter interpretation. Latest software allows you to adjust average per sport profile. anyhow if you’re changing it in one place it has effect for all of them 🙁 What i do not understand as well is lack of possibility to have power recording in full resolution and display for requested avg values (e.g 5 sec and 30 mins at the same time). I won’t be also mentioning lack of power based training in either watch or flow. Last but not least is lack of synchronization between phases and other platforms like TP. But at the end – it’s really stable, accurate and reliable platform for everyday training…

Comments are closed.