Epson Discontinue RunSense & ProSense Ranges

I have just had confirmation that Epson have discontinued the entire RunSense and ProSense ranges of run and triathlon watches

Source: Epson Customer Service (America)







I had assumed that the RunSense range from a few years ago had already been discontinued and that included these models: SF810, SF-710, SF-610…etc. This is reflected by their removal from the Epson website (Source:

Whilst these never seemed to have sold too well in Europe I had a lingering impression that they did OK in Asia.

I have some pleasant, but fading, memories of reviewing the SF-810 in 2015. It was a solid runners’ watch.  A proper runners’ watch and did a decent all round job on the hardware front. The supporting data infrastructure is etched into my memory for other reasons (it wasn’t great). Still if you could get data out of their environment all was generally good.

Source:, clicks to – NB it says DISCONTINUED


Bring on 2015’s ProSense range. That had the abbreviation ‘PRO’ in the name so it must be good. The range had 2 running watches and 3 triathlon watches. Which, at the time I was impressed by (link to:

DCR had a very good early look at the entire range in an ‘everything you want to know post’ (Source: All looked reasonably good for Epson with the weight of the mighty Japanese behemoth behind the product; what could possibly go wrong?. But the one thing I wanted to know was, “When is third-party sensor support being implemented“. I guess DCR would have liked to have had the answer to that same question too. You can guess the reason why. Yep a $400ish top-end tri watch was being released with ZERO 3rd party sensor support. as far as I know it was never subsequently added. That kinda looked like the market research department might have been on holiday during the prep for that launch.

Nevertheless they looked like ‘proper’ sports watches; perhaps a little on the chunky side but also sporting a very decent battery life.

Epson-range-ProsenseThere was never any European distribution as far as I know with the focus being on North America (presumably Asia too).

The bottom line is that the plug has been pulled. Hopefully this is not too old news.

So What?

I’m not entirely sure on everything we can take out from this.

If it were time for a song then….”Another one bites the dust” is the perennial favourite.

If you were going to imagine a newcomer to the sports watch market who wants to take on Garmin in a big way right from the get-go, then you would probably find very few suitable companies who had a chance. Epson would probably have been one that you might have taken a bet on with some half-decent odds.

A tentative conclusion I would draw is that we are unlikely to see any new entrants going for anything other than a niche product as a way to enter the market. I think ‘BRAND’ and ‘BRAND COMPETENCE’ are important factors when trying to crystal ball-gaze. Also bearing in mind that the ‘medium price + medium volume’ business model tends to eventually fail in favour of high price/low volume and low price/high volume models (Apple, Amazfit, Garmin…).

I’ll still stick by this…

2018: Peaktastic not Garmintastic – Year Ahead for Sports Tech

Edit: as of 2nd July I have just seen this comment: but it seems that no-one else read it, even DCR! Nice find @MarioS

Reader-Powered Content

This content is not sponsored. It’s mostly me behind the labour of love which is this site and I appreciate everyone who follows, subscribes or Buys Me A Coffee ❤️ Alternatively please buy the reviewed product from my partners. Thank you! FTC: Affiliate Disclosure: Links pay commission. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.