Polar Vantage V2 Accuracy When Polar initially released the Vantage V1, they were keen to stress a differentiator for them in the market was accuracy. Specifically included in that was the original Precision Prime oHR Sensor (we are now on…
If you are logged in as a supporter the full, detailed content will appear here. The detailed accuracy reports are always supporter-only content.
Here is the summary and you can become a supporter here if you want to, these take a lot of time to produce and all support is gratefully received.
Summary
My Polar Vantage V2 Review unit performed fairly well in accuracy tests across the triathlon sports and accuracy is improved over the first generation Vantage. Its main weakness was shown in the last few open water swims I managed this year where both HR and GPS were lacking compared to Garmin who also seem to have stepped up a notch in OWS over the last year or so. Most GPS devices tend to do well at cycling and the Vantage V2 is no different. However, the hardest tests for accuracy are when running. The Polar Vantage V2 matched what typical Garmins deliver with running and, other than an occasional wobbly with oHR, there was little to separate a normal Garmin oHR/GLONASS performance to a normal V2 oHR/GLONASS performance. I repeat a GNSS test for every running-capable watch and the V2's best score was an acceptable 75%.
How does gps accuracy of vantage v2 compare to that of the original vantage?
Could you comment on that?
i found the VM better than the VV
spreadsheet of results and test files are linked to here: https://the5krunner.com/2016/11/05/test-route-for-gps-devices/
Wow, thanks!
If I read the results in the xls right, the vantage TITAN is actually better than the brand new vantage v2 (looking at gps-accuracy). Well, it’s not worlds apart, it’s 79% vs 75% according to the xls. I wonder, is this firmware issues? Should we expect the v2 to improve over the next months via firmware upgrades?
each test is just one test and, yes, conditions and firmware vary from one to the next.
i guess you can’t really compare the test results too literally (I use real-world experience to take a view on accuracy in my reviews and this is just one input) but i guess they are indicative.
i saw your xls file and i saw vantage v2 model a & model b..what’s the differences? how do we know which one is model a and which is model b?
there is no difference. I just had two devices.
thanks for reply. it’s interesting that the result difference between the 2 is like heaven and earth. i’m actually surprised (or not so) at suunto 9 final accuracy at near the top. i got suunto 9 recently and the gps accuracy really doesn’t disappoint, though the ohr, well…. you know and i know …