Garmin confirms more AMOLED and CIQ4 – hints on the 955

Affiliate Disclosure: All links pay commission

Reading Time: 3 minutes

 

Garmin digs deeper with AMOLED

Increased graphics capabilities within CIQ4 to better take advantage of AMOLED/LCD screens

My coverage of the announcement of the recent AMOLED-packed Garmin D2-AirΒ  was a non-subtle hint from me that Garmin is actively moving deeper into that particular aspect of tech. There are clearly a few naysayers who either don’t want that kind of screen or who don’t believe that it will improve. Fine, believe what you want to. But it’s coming, folks.

I’ve said numerous times that people want pretty screens. It’s a statement of the obvious. Dcrainmaker and Apple also agree and you might want to check out dcr’s recent, and LONG presentation on the future of Sports Tech. I think dcr has got this one spot on and, if you are interested in ‘future stuff’, then he picks up the big trends. I also cover some of the finer details here in a somewhat shorter post ;-). Here is dcr’s YouTube presentation:

 

 

Garmin CIQ4

Today is turning into a bit of a Ray-love-fest as he also summed up some of the futures of CIQ4 that were announced at the recent Garmin developer conference. The parts of that which affects consumer-facing tech are also interesting to me (details on Ray’s post here) specifically it’s this point “Increased graphics capabilities within CIQ4 to better take advantage of AMOLED/LCD screens

Trend: Venu, D2 Air, AMOLED in CIQ4 … AMOLED *IS* coming folks.

Will it be coming in performance, adventure watches in 2021? Err… No, probably not. At least not in the top-end model πŸ˜‰

Baby Fenix 7, anyone?

CIQ4 – Launching Apps

This was interesting too, “Apps can now be launched at any time, including from an activity“. It always seemed odd to me that I had to start the STRYD app (or any app) as if it were a sports profile in itself. Once in the app or in the normal sport profile that was it. You were stuck there to the bitter end of your pain fest. I’m guessing that now it will be possible to have an app as a page within your sports profile, which seems far more logical and sensible to me.

CIQ4 – AMOLED – Timings

Another key takeout here for us here is that we are going to see the first CIQ4-capable watch in 2021. Possibly as soon as January. Surprisingly it seems that aspects of CIQ4 will not be compatible on ANY previous watch, perhaps even that CIQ4 will not be available to any existing watches???. So if you’ve just bought your Garmin Fenix 6X super-pro-solar-titanium with gold knobbly bits on it then GRRRR, it won’t support the new widget-glance-apps from CIQ4. Only the new watches will. I was surprised to read that but it is what it is and it means that, once again, Garmin has given us a nice way to tick off which modes are replaced with a CIQ4 equivalent, this then helps us know which CIQ3.X models will be replaced next πŸ˜‰ Thank you.

It’s most likely that we will first see CIQ4 in a significant watch. So that means a MARQv2, Vivoactive 5/Venu 2 or, more likely, a Garmin Fenix 7 in September (ish) 2021. You could perhaps also assume that there is some more powerful onboard tech there to make the device faster too.

The timings of a new AMOLED model are less clear. The most obvious call would be for a Venu2 in mid-2021, maybe that could be the first CIQ4 device as well?Β  An AMOLED-enabled Venu 2 WILL probably happen at some point but something else could sneak in there to be the first AMOLED/LCD model we see.

The D2 Air I mentioned above is effectively a repackaged Venu. Perhaps Garmin plans to repackage other models and add an AMOLED screen. Perhaps we’ll see a 245 AMOLED or a mid-range, mass-market AMOLED tri-watch (remember the Forerunner 745 is a small top-end FR945 and not really a 735XT replacement). Maybe the 735XT‘s true replacement will be a pretty-screened version designed to take you through a sub-3-hour Olympic triathlon. There’s some logic there.

Maybe the Forerunner 955 LTE in Jan 2021 will also have AMOLED? Or maybe the LTE version won’t have AMOLED but the non-LTE version will? (Probably not). My bet? A larger screen and, err, an LTE option.

Take Out

Yep. Garmin is moving in the right direction. Just pretty-up that user interface, deliver a wholesale increase to oHR/GNSS accuracy and all will be good.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reader-Powered Content

Follow the5krunner
This content is not sponsored. It's mostly me behind the labour of love which is this site, meaning it's entirely reader-powered content ❀️ I'd really appreciate it if you'd follow, subscribe or consider getting me an e-Coffee ❀️ Alternatively please buy the reviewed product via the5krunner.com (which costs you no extra) and, for that, I receive a small commission. Thank you!
Β 
Affiliate Disclosure: All links pay commission
Support this site with purchases at these partners - should click to a local choice in your country
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
21 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Kissane

Maybe the 655 AMOLED! Just trying to keep the 655 saga ongoing πŸ™‚

fff

and then we will talk about battery life again πŸ™‚

Andy

I don’t understand the ‘want’ for prettier screens – if you take a typical Garmin watch and scroll through a few pages what do you see? Basically it’s all numbers, some simple graphs, text displaying training status etc – none of this is graphically intense and doesn’t need AMOLED or even many colours at all. The only use-case for a better display is mapping in my view, and even then I find maps on such a small display basically useless and I don’t see AMOLED or LED changing that. Honestly, I’d be happy with a larger display with less bezel, retaining the same overall size, that for me would be a far bigger improvement than more colours for the sake of it. I think there is a danger with bloggers such as yourself to ‘hype’ the next big thing – certainly in my running clubs (with many fell runners), the best runners are typically using old tech – they know that a new watch isn’t going to improve them and they tend not to have ‘upgradeitus’. Conversely the weaker runners are more likely to sport the latest tech… among the best, I see a lot of Sunnto Ambit 2 /… Read more Β»

Martin Vereecken

It’s perfectly fine you don’t understand. I would say I’m part of the “real” runner community, but I also a fan of newer toys and nice design. So this combination exists :-). I like it when I can use my sportswatch as a regular, good looking watch. And a nice screen makes the watch look better. I don’t want an Apple Watch, because I prefer my sportswatch and I don’t want 2 watches. But I think it would be nice if aestatics can improve, that’s all.

Matthew Hearne

I think that the ultra running community are probably more interested in newer tech compared to the fell running community. Things like battery life and navigation are important aspects for us and I’d love to have a watch with detailed maps on a clear screen when I’m running long distance footpaths. Despite having a geography degree, I find carrying a paper based map quite fiddly and it’s just one more thing to add weight to the backpack when navigating over 70+ miles.

The concept of ‘best runners’ using old tech isn’t quite true from my experience. As a race director for an ultra marathon I notice that the winners very often have modern watches. Obviously the watch doesn’t make them go faster, but I’ve had some of the fastest long distance runners in the UK complete the race and they very often have newer devices.

Best runners using old tech…seems that Kipchoge was recently photographed training with a Coros Apex Pro πŸ™‚

tfk, the5krunner

re ultra: some nice maps on the AW6 πŸ˜‰ comment image
perhaps the battery life might be less than helpful tho

gingerneil

Agree 100% with apps within activities screens. Having them separate has always seemed a bit odd to me. You note stryd, but I can also see things like navigation/mapping apps benefiting from this assuming that garmin would allow a ‘competing’ navigation app to display as a page within an activity.

TheNewNormal

Doesn’t the Venu already have an AMOLED display?

Alex Fuller

So you’re thinking 955 is in Jan? Any other rumors on the Airspeed sensor that sort of leaked on their site a while back?

Fabio

I think i could wait Jan for a 955 but even if i usually race in ironman and 70.3 i’d like to try some trail races in the next few months… If Fenix 7 won’t be presented before Q3 2021 i think i ll go for the fenix 6x Pro

Martin

Aha, i think you know something 🀨

inSyt

AMOLED is super pretty, until it switches off or switches to low power mode to save battery. Luckily, Garmin’s range is massive enough to accommodate all known display types.

Stef

it seems like Garmin came out with the PowerGlass tech and then just.. forgot about it?
shouldn’t they come out with a 955 Solar next?

tfk, the5krunner

they will match the specific tech with customer need.
maybe an edge 530+ solar would be next? (probably not)