new Garmin Running Power coming 2021 | impacts on Strava + Forerunner 955

FTC: Affiliate Disclosure: All links pay commissionReading Time: 8 minutes

garmin running powerGarmin and Strava have some running goodies in store…maybe

I had hoped to get all the information here fully corroborated with each point from a couple of sources…but didn’t. All the points here individually come from single sources. So this post should be treated as rumour, opinion and conjecture. Some of this stuff has been hoped for and rumoured for quite some time yet now it looks relatively imminent ie 3-6 month timeframe.

This post links together changes linked to Garmin Connect, Stryd, Strava and new Garmin watches for 2021…exciting news for everyone!

Native Running Power

It seems that Garmin has been working on native running power for some time and that it is close to going live.

I was surprised to hear this as my previous understanding was that Garmin and Stryd were both happy with the status quo whereby each of them produced and separately displayed & stored their own flavours of running power. To an outsider, this seemed a somewhat perverse stand-off as such an outsider would assume that Stryd would want to be natively integrated into the full Garmin ecosystem..not so. My personal take was that perhaps the current impasse provided a significant barrier-to-entry for other startups? thus insulating Stryd from new competition to some degree.

What is NATIVE Running Power – ‘Native’ refers to when Running Power becomes an intrinsic and interwoven part of the platform just like heart rate, cadence, speed or bike power. Polar, Coros and Suunto already treat running power natively.

Look at Stryd’s current platform where they have replicated the links, functions, alerts and related metrics that should already be in the ANT+ spec. It must have been MANY man-years of work to get where they are today. And where they are today is in a position of offering a high-quality and near-complete ecosystem, regardless of what you might think of the trainign merits of running power or the accuracy of their pod.

What has Garmin done? Nothing. Well, at least nothing much PUBLICALLY since their excellent Garmin Running Power apps were released more than 3 years ago.

Remember, for Garmin to implement native running power there would be a significant cost. It’s not just changing the name of the field in a FIT file. There would have to be changes to structured workout creation, running plans, alerts, related data fields and more. It would take man-years of work to do all this. And let’s say a man-year of work costs Garmin $100,000 if you include an allocation of various overheads.

That’s a very nice freebie for Garmin to give us. Thank you!

Naturally, the reality is that they would want something in return – fair enough.


A Garmin Running Power Pod to rival Stryd?

I’ve no intel on new hardware at all, sorry.

A Garmin running pod is the only way that I can see hardware helping to DIRECTLY recover the cost of implementing native running power. Of course, INDIRECTLY, Garmin could instead be aiming for running power on the wrist like Polar/Coros and that might help to keep shifting high-end Forerunners and Fenix watches from all the e-shelves. Or Garmin could do both.

If Garmin changes the Connect platform to fully integrate native running power for a physical pod then the integration of a software algorithm working solely off wrist-based sensors would be MUCH cheaper than for a standalone project. But that logic would probably not qork quite so well in reverse ie if Garmn first chose to implement a wrist-based algorithm , the cost of then developing and distributing a physical product is significant.

But is there a market for new Garmin Power Pod Hardware in any case?

I suspect it’s not so hard to replicate the published algorithms and accurate sensors used in the existing Stryd pod to make a new pod. It’s just that I’ve wondered if there is a sufficiently large market for it to tickle Garmin’s interest in the first place.

Let’s explore the market potential.

We could guess that the market is at least somewhere near the number of free Garmin Running Power (GRP) downloads-to-date: 73,141. However, that would include people like me who installed it but don’t use it and it will include people who installed it because it was free and who would never pay to run with power.

Of course, it excludes others who might want a proper solution that takes into account actual wind rather than forecast wind from a weather app on Garmin Connect; GRP only takes vague wind estimates for your area and takes potentially inaccurate GPS positioning info and so must be wrong.

Then again there’s probably at least a market of 34,419 people who have actually spent $200ish on Stryd, maybe they could be tempted to buy a different or better pod? (probably not)

Yet Stryd’s market IS even bigger than 34,419. Stryd also sells to runners who use Apple Watch, Samsung, Polar Vantage V2 and other devices. The 34,419 figure probably also excludes people who couldn’t be bothered to upgrade to the zones data field from the earlier Stryd app (11,212 downloads) and earlier data fields (Stryd Power 39,996 downloads)

Thus my guess for the active market size for running with power would be

  • Stryd 65,000 active units, probably more.
  • Garmin Running Power 20,000 active runners, maybe more
  • Polar native power less than 5,000 active runners
  • Coros native power less than 1,000 active runners
  • Others (various apps, excluding those using Stryd) less than 10,000 active runners

Of course Garmin has your data in Garmin Conenct. GDPR-permitting it knows some of the real figures to a greater degree of accuracy than my guesses here.

Anyway, that’s almost a nice round 100,000 active users who are probably all mostly happy with what they currently have. You could argue the numbers and breakdown up and down a bit but I reckon that 100,000 is ‘about right’. I doubt very much the figure would be 150,000 let alone 200,000 and it’s definitely more than 50,000.

If Garmin released their own pod then, for sure, it would sell, I’d buy one for a start. Maybe when bundled up with a watch and with some new niche features added, like dual-sided power, it would tempt a small proportion of users to switch; it could even sell 100,000 units over a few years? Or maybe it would be significantly lower at 10,000 pod sales? Who knows exactly? But it wouldn’t sell 500,000.

Nevertheless, the maths is still favourable

100,000 units at $200 = a lot.

Any Garmin pod would almost certainly broadcast using BLE and ANT+ so it would and could sell to Apple Watch users (of whom there are more serious runners using it than you think). It would probably even be able to easily work with the existing Stryd WatchOS app 😉 as both would very soon end up using the new ANT+ standard that would be agreed.

Further up, I posed the question “Is there a market for a new Garmin running power pod?“, my answer would be that there is not a clear cut case for Garmin. However, the real appeal to Garmin may be the power-from-the wrist option to help keep differentiating and pushing their high-end watch sales. THAT is probably their motivation, although I still can’t see where a sensible wind estimate would come from in such a scenario – perhaps a revitalised TEMPE unit that more accurately measures environmental stuff like temperature, wind, air pressure???

Running Power on Strava

Running power data that was originally sent to Strava for runs a couple of years used to be accepted by Strava. However, Strava did not have separate repositories for running power and bike power. The two are essentially different and Strava was combining them. For triathletes, this causes a very significant problem and that was one of the reasons that strava stopped accepting running power.

Things have moved on a little.

I am aware of various data feeds from Strava that have contained running power for many months.

Other info here:

And here from March:


So, this and other intel, suggests that Strava is working to include Running Power more holistically in their platform, just like Garmin. In a way, this is a little surprising as it will be an expensive exercise for Strava. On the other hand, running power will inevitably be stashed away for Strava premium subscribers and may even create some new subscribers and the yearned-for revenue that Strava needs. Maybe.

Talking of revenues and subscriptions, Stryd’s recent feature additions (training plans) will also be going subscriber-only in 2021 (just the NEW features), plans from Training Peaks and Final Surge cost money, your new high-end Garmin will cost money and Strava Premium costs money. I sense subscriber fatigue is going to be something we all have to deal with in the coming years. 

Running Power on Training Peaks, Final Surge, Today’s Plan and other platforms

These guys have all modified their platforms over the last 3 years to accept FIT files and other sources that contain proprietary running power. You might think they might be a bit miffed at these potential new changes but, from what I’ve heard, it’s probably no biggie for them to easily switch to native running power.


The Mythical Forerunner 655

For John 😉

New top-end Garmin watch models typically have disclosed and undisclosed bits of better-performing hardware, be it a better processor (undisclosed) or larger screen area (disclosed). They also tend to have ‘some new feature’ to tempt us to switch. That could be a hardware feature, like LTE (cellular connection without a smartphone present) or it could be a software feature like Track Mode on the FR745 which then quickly gets backwardly ported to a select group of other ‘recent’ high-end watches.

Whilst there are still no rumours of a new top-end, running-only Forerunner 655, there ARE strong rumours of a new Forerunner 955 and Forerunner 955 LTE and these rumours are almost certainly correct.

Clearly LTE will open up Garmin to the opportunities of introducing new functionality. OK, it will eat battery but it could, for example, broadcast your live race stats and position to family members. That’s nice but I’m not sure how attractive a sporting feature LTE will prove to be. And I’m not sure how attractive a smart feature LTE will be for a Garmin watch either. For example, I could use an Apple Watch 6 LTE to ask Siri for help but Garmin is much more limited at delivering on wider smart features like that.

Clearly native running power for Garmin could be a new, sports-specific feature that would justify an upgrade for some of us.

As for the FR955, well, it is going to have a better processor, a LARGER SCREEN AREA (yay), and probably/finally Quickfit bands. Maybe even a sleep widget 😉


Sources: confidential

Take Out

Garmin is going to soon release native running power along with either a hardware/software mechanism that produces the power numbers for new, top-end Forerunners/Fenixes.

As always some of you will think this is made up. I guess it could be (it isn’t). But, then again, there is always an unfortunate bit of info somewhere else if you look hard enough



AI Triathlon Training Plans – Running & Cycling too


Reader-Powered Content

This content is not sponsored. It's mostly me behind the labour of love which is this site, meaning it's entirely reader-powered content ❤️ I'd really appreciate it if you'd follow, subscribe or Buy Me A Coffee ❤️ Alternatively please buy the reviewed product from my partners (which costs you no extra) and, for that, I receive a small commission. Thank you! FTC: Affiliate Disclosure: All links pay commission

29 thoughts on “new Garmin Running Power coming 2021 | impacts on Strava + Forerunner 955

  1. Potentially some good news. Anything that gets run power used more will benefit Stryd. I image they’ll need to tweek their subscription service a bit if native power happens. With Garmin native run power and therefore Garmin Workouts being free, Stryd will need to offer very clear benefits – most likely more PowerCentre functionality. Happy days!

  2. I hope that the having native running power on new garmin sportwatches doesn’t mean also price increase . The top end garmin sportwatches are way to expensive for the accuracy they are offering.

    1. I’d allocate <1% chance of your hope being realised. If a 745 cost £450 RRP, a 945 will be ~£550-650 I'd guess. Sorry.

    2. I suspect with pricing …the only way is UP. It’s how to justify it that is the interesting part,

  3. Users would be happy if Garmin focuses on increasing GPS accuracy. For native running power, the sad thing is maybe it will be exclusive to only new and high end products. If that is the case, it is hardly compete with Stryd in openness (software and hardware) and compatibility.

    1. In the short term you’re correct. On average I change my watch ever 3 years. So you can well imagine that in say 6-8 years most watches on people’s wrists will have native run power.

    2. yes a lot of users (me and you for a start!) will be happy with more gps accuracy. I think Garmin IS getting there as here . however i just dont think the current tech or next year’s tech is going to make a tangible step-change as I covered here . that said there is perhaps still more that can come over and above those new chips. that’s an article for another day.

      why can’t garmin increase accuracy AND give us native running power 😉

      My thinking would be that native running power is a metric like bike cadence. so it’s open to you if you have a bike cadence sensor. so your question really is “what would be the inputs to populate native running power ?” that would include stryd or new garmin hardware or an algorithm (that’s only in top-end watches with a barometer). the argument from garmin here is that you buy a top-end watch and effectievly get a free running power meter thrown in.

      so the NATIVE running metric will be FULLY OPEN through published standards (ANT+, maybe BLE)

      1. Another alternative is just developing the good foot pod (not necessary the power meter). Running power of many brand is not meaningful due to the mechanism of watch to calculate pace through GPS. Even though it is more responsive than HR but is is not as good as running pod based power meter. The current Garmin pod have been released few years ago and there is still no new foot pod until now.

        1. yes, agreed
          stryd had the stryd pod LITE (no power), i don’t think it sold well enough to keep going.

          gps.agreed. although garmin can use a footpod as an input for pace…ie garmin run power will accept accurate pace from stryd…go figure 😉

          garmin have to have some value-added feature in their accessories to justify the premium that their shareholders NEED. ie they HAVE to get good margins. maybe ‘accuracy’ is that feature, IDK, but power certainly would be such a feature. ie they need to sell a $200 footpod and not a $60 footpod (same argument for hrm-pro which has caching, running dynamics and ski power)

  4. Could the new Forerunner 745 already have The required hardware for native running power? Only a software update away when the 955 comes out? That would be good to know and possibly influence buying decisions.

    1. the minimum required hardware is a barometer and an accelerometer. so, yes ! how accurate the accelerometer might be is another question. i guess that’s why you currently need hrm-tri/rd-pod for GRP

      1. Maybe the better question is whether or not the 745 is predestined to receive native power. Maybe this why the 655 never happens – as the 745 receives running power to replace the 655 as the king runners watch without building an additional SKU that is essentially the same hardware.

        1. yes it would probably be pre-destined (which brings us back to your question about new innards that we can only speculate on)
          yes maybe the 655 won’t happen for those reasons you say (I somewhat agree with that chain of thought).
          maybe the 955/955lte and 655 get released at the same time in one big launch like the 245/45 IIRC

  5. I think that FR 655 is very real. If we look at FR 645, it was fist watch which had onboard music and I have a feeling that they will do the same with FR 655, but it will be next big thing.

    In case it is really native running power, I am really curious whether it will tricking down to previous gen (x45, minus 645). What do you think, what are the chances?

    1. i’m assuming that an ant standard will be made for this (Garmin could do their own thing in some other way with ciq/ciq4, same as they have done with GRP)
      there’s two things

      1. the nativeness of running power – i’m assuming any watch can choose to support ‘the’ standard for displaying/saving.
      2. the sensor that feeds it – any sensor can choose to support the standard for creating power, this can be a watch. I doubt THIS ability will trickle too far backwards down the existing watch models, for a start it would need a barometer

    2. I do not think 655 will be released as 745 has filled that gap. If 655 is released,it likely will be 745 without tri feature. (When 745 is just like 945 without map and lower battery life.) If this is true,the price point of 655 is also difficult to be decided to prevent competition with 745 and 245.

      1. If they are following the legacy “Sony” model of having a product at every price point, then look for the current or future hole in their price list for a space big enough to insert another five-button into. I would like to think they will have offerings that violate the hierarchical model numbering scheme and offer unique appeal that isn’t just firmware. Hardware power pod would be one way to do such a thing.

        What I know for certain is that I have no interest in new features on my FR945. Last year I would have agreed it was a responsive device with great battery life. This week, not so much.

    1. Not unless Polar can prove Garmin have taken a unique Polar algorithm. The general rules of physics are open source.

  6. I’m a little confused….when you say launch native running power and relating to new model watches….are you meaning they will launch capabilities to calculate/display via the watch? Or do you think there will be possibilities to pair with Stryd and record/display native power from an external source?

    Because if it’s using a Stryd pod, then surely it’s just a software update so not really relevant to hardware launch?

    1. hi
      1. yes possibly new calculation on the watch
      2. yes a native treatment of running power. so if you create an alert it could be a pace alert or a hr alert…or a running power alert. that’s what native means. ie its fully integrated into the ANT/Garmin ecosystem and NOT an add-on with CIQ
      3. yes that is firmware/software. However the software/firmware will partly justify the hardware launch
      4. yes anyway the ability to calcualte power on the wrist might only be in the new hardware. (with the firmware to handle native power being rolled out to some earlier models)

      i think maybe i’m not explaining it clearly. happy to elaborate/clarify as there are a couple of overlapping things he plus a bit of uncertainty.

  7. Coros and Polar already do running power right from the watch and coros is spooky similar to stryd without wind adjustment.

    Garmin’s current terrible version requires hrm/run/tri/pro

    But Garmin almost never “backport” features, for example respiration rate is available on half a dozen newer Garmins when using HRM strap but despite still active marketing/sales for Fenix5 series, they never port it, even as a widget. Heck the vivoactive4 gets RR but not Fenix5? Really?

    Stryd with wind will probably be best through 2021.

    Now if stryd wanted to do something amazing, somehow turn it also into a cycling power meter but I guess downforce can’t be calculated. They could however use the wind port to calculate reverse force like the powerpod?

    1. yes
      i think you’re referencing rays test
      here are som emore thoughts
      one of my take outs was “The chart clearly shows that STRYD and Coros can agree when there IS a STRYD wind effect but that they can also be very different when there is little or no wind effect.” they’re not comparable in my experience. i agreee there is some similarity in the chart. even coros say they dont match up with stryd

  8. Since recently there is a sports-selection screen when setting power zones in Garmin Conntect Mobile. For now you can only select Cycling-Zones but they wouldn’t have introduced this selection screen for nothing.

      1. Ah, I’m on Android. This is how it looks like. not like the HF zone Screen so maybe something they forgot to remove.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *