Wahoo Roam 2 Review
Wahoo’s new Roam 2 looks similar to its predecessor and boasts six significant software features plus improved capabilities under the hood, all aimed at improving cycling experiences, let’s start with a summary review and further dive into all the new features.
Over the last 3 or 4 years, Wahoo has emerged as Garmin’s primary challenger. Why?
A: Garmin Edge bike computers will always have more features than a Wahoo Roam or Wahoo Bolt, but cyclists and triathletes like Wahoo in growing numbers because of the superior rider experience. Usability is the most important feature that you use on every ride.
USA – $399
Euro – Eu349
GB – £399 (?!?)
Verdict: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ - Awesome at everything except super-advanced navigation. You might not like its looks but it's my favourite larger-format bike computer.
new Wahoo ELEMNT Roam 2 Review - the most usable bike computer for performance and general navigation.
The new Wahoo Roam 2 is a faster device than its 3-year-old predecessor. Every existing feature is carried over, and there are now some significant improvements, like hill climbing functionality, public route sharing, and more.
Battery life is unchanged, but charge time is faster. While the device//screen is essentially the same size, screen quality is much improved, with the colours boosted from 8 to 64. Maps are now more detailed and look better on this display.
Every kind of riding support you need is covered by the new Wahoo Elemnt ROAM, ranging from following a course from RwGPS whilst on holiday to chasing Strava segment PRs live on your TT bike. If leading-edge, adaptive power training with Xert is your thing or if that lung-busting FTP booster session from Training Peaks is more your cup of tea, then all will be good in both cases. Naturally, there are dedicated features to help you segment-hunt and navigate from Strava.
ROAM 2 handles niche but essential use cases like following variable efforts over a Best Bike Split course with your Kickr smart trainer and raising and lowering your bike with a Kickr Climb. Heck, even your sweat will be compatible with your Kickr mat—or anyone else’s mat, for that matter.
Multi-sport support is at the heart of Wahoo’s thinking, with a novel feature to nicely hand off race control during your triathlon to your Elemnt Rival watch.
Maybe you have a bog-standard heart rate strap or rely on a Garmin Varia Radar light for safety, or perhaps you have a pressing need to display 14 kinds of muscle oxygen data metrics, Glucose metrics from Supersapiens or a Di2 gear visual chart; you guessed it. All is good.
The new Wahoo Elemnt Roam is the real deal, supported by an expansive and impressive cycling ecosystem. Wahoo is in the cycling game for the long term, and it is Garmin’s only real competitor.
Garmin Edge bike computers are good; of course they are. Yet they have slightly more, often useless, features worsened by the difficulty of finding those features. Garmin seems unable to stop itself from cramming everything possible into the menus, and if kitchen sinks were part of cycling, they’d be in there, too! Wahoo significantly simplifies the bike computer experience and lets you do all the one-off cycling admin on the Elemnt companion app. That’s why the new ROAM 2 is so easy to use. Oh, it’s also easy to use because there is no touchscreen. I wouldn’t say I like bike computer touchscreens on the whole. The only real differentiator where Garmin wins is its CIQ app store, and cyclists with precise or unusual riding needs should always go for Garmin. But that’s only a tiny percentage of the people reading this…
Pros
- Complete smart trainer environment control – fan, trainers, gradient simulator
- Great Strava, RwGPS & TP integrations, + many more
- *Total TBT routing*, re-routing and POI routing with a proper onboard map
- Onboard DEM – Digital Elevation Map for correct elevation.
- Full integration for 3rd party training plans and complex structured workouts
- Highly intuitive interface, simplified by offloading rarely used features to the companion app.
- Supports all external BLE & ANT+ sensors of note plus Supersapiens
- Sensibly tough Gorilla glass, easy-to-read colour screen and buttons that work with gloves
- LEDs for clear zone alerts and visual feedback for navigation and Varia Radar.
- Live tracking and notifications via the partner app.
- Very many performance Features
- Safety Features
- Well-built and well-designed hardware
USA – $399
Euro – Eu349
GB – £399 (?!?)
Cons
- Few physiology insights
- Utilitarian rather than beautiful
- Wahoo’s ecosystem cannot currently add 3rd party apps
- No touchscreen – that’s a good thing, right?
- You must have a smartphone to (re-)configure most options.
Wahoo Roam 2 – What’s New
It’s a significantly new piece of hardware that introduces and develops several essential features.
TL;DR – Neat hill climbing functionality, plus you get to share workouts & routes better between people & platforms.
- Supersapiens support – live display of Glucose level and trend [At Launch, Bolt 2/Roam 2 only]
- Outdoor workouts – You can sync your training plan from Wahoo X and follow workouts outdoors. Completed workouts sync back to Wahoo X for compliance scoring and planned workouts sync in advance to your Roam 2. [At Launch]
- New Roam setup – You can backup the sensors, pages and other settings from your old Wahoo bike computer and restore them when you set up the new Roam [at launch]
- Maps offer more details with colouration and selected POIs. [at launch]
- Summit segments – This is Wahoo’s next step toward better hill climbing features, starting with automatically detected climbs when you are following a route. [now live, Roam 1/2, Bolt 2]
- Public route sharing – is an app-based feature that helps groups of riders or organised events share route files for any ELEMNT. [now live]
TL;DR – better GPS, better screen, faster, and more storage for maps
- More Accuracy from the new Sony GPS Chip – gives super accurate dual-band GNSS over all the key satellite systems. All systems + Dual-band is permanently enabled.
- The 64-colour screen is the same as the Bolt 2 but bigger. Roam 1 had 8+1 colours.
- New, faster processor
- 32Gb memory – was 4Gb on Roam 1 and is 16Gb on Bolt 2.
- New convex top buttons, easier to feel and press
- New, slightly larger side buttons that have been slightly differently positioned
- New USB-C charging port
- New LEDs and ambient light sensor components
Competitor Comparisons
New Wahoo Elemnt Roam vs Garmin Edge 1040 – What’s the difference?
The new Wahoo Elemnt Roam competes with the Garmin Edge 1040, a performance bikenav.
The essential differences between Wahoo and Garmin are that Garmin has a deeper pedigree in mapping and map intelligence; Garmin has an app store (CIQ); a Garmin Edge is fully configurable as a standalone device and doesn’t need an app but as a result, they are complex to administer; Wahoo devices are slick to use and their interface seems ‘obvious’ once mastered; both Garmin & Wahoo tend to control retail prices as best they can.
Most cyclist and triathletes will be perfectly happy with either a Garmin or Wahoo.
Those of you with highly complex sports tech requirements and immersive routing needs will already own a Garmin Edge and won’t be reading a review like this for guidance!
I need Garmin devices to run this site, but as a cyclist and triathlete, I prefer and typically use Wahoo Bolt 2/Hammerhead Karoo 2 bike computers.
New Wahoo Bolt 2 vs new Wahoo Elemnt ROAM 2 – What’s the difference?
The key difference is simply the size. ROAM is bigger than Bolt, with a bigger screen that is slightly more suited for navigating.
There are several less essential differences, as the ROAM has a slightly better battery life and improved internals. From now on, Bolt 2 and Roam 2 will share the same features.
Deep Dive – Navigating and the new Wahoo Roam Dual Band GPS Accuracy
TL;DR – Roam 2 is more accurate than Roam 1…but to the extent that it doesn’t really matter. What matters is the more responsive screen on the Roam 2 which, to me, trumps the usefulness of a more coloured and more detailed map.
Q: What is dual-band?
A: Wahoo now considers two frequencies (bands) from every satellite it connects to. Each signal may be reflected or refracted differently en route to ROAM 2. The more the derived positions from these two frequencies differ, the less likely ROAM 2 will be to rely on them.
The bottom line is that Accuracy is theoretically improved in urban canyons, steep-sided valleys, and under tree cover. Coros and Garmin have used this technology for about a year, but this is the first time any company has used Sony’s GPS chip.
My experience with the original Roam was that Accuracy on regular roads was just fine for 98% of the time. Occasionally, it would be slightly off-track, and I’d never notice the other 2%. That’s a thing of the past now, and I’d say that the new Roam is fine 99% of the time!
I’ve already covered a few hundred miles with Roam 2, but my one off-road test was through several areas of dense tree cover. The new and old Roam bike computers were running alongside the Apple Watch Ultra and Garmin Forerunner 955 on my wrists.
The results were not exciting. The Forerunner 955 was slightly worse, but I had that set to work less accurately with GPS-only to maximise battery life. Roam 2 and the Apple Watch Ultra used dual-band and performed indistinguishably from each other. They were both a little bit better than the old Roam, but to the point where you had to look hard to see the difference. Check out these images to spot the tiny differences in some of these tree-lined sections. The final picture shows a roundabout/circle with no trees, and the GPS reception there is excellent…just as it is on roads 99% of the time.
Here are some images from a typical country ride through towns and trees, often with open skies. The Roam 2 had zero issues. The Forerunner 955 had some minor issues (circled) but only used GPS.
So you might think “Roam 2’s navigation is not much different from Roam 1”, but you’d be wrong because the navigational improvements lie elsewhere.
The most obvious improvement is the responsiveness when using the map screen. The screen draws more quickly, and routes load much more rapidly. You can see from the earlier image of the two Roams side by side that the new Roam has more detail and better colour. I like the ‘more detail’ aspect of this as it just looks nicer, even though it doesn’t help navigation one iota. The addition of colour, however, is a different matter. The new colours add more distraction, but others will likely say they add more context. I agree that context is essential when navigating, but mainly, it helps running rather than cycling, where you tend to follow relatively obvious paths with the latter.
Summary: The Roam 2 is great and has improved for occasional navigators like me and most triathletes. However, your best bets for frequent navigators/bike explorers who need more intricate routing features are still Garmin and Hammerhead, but Wahoo might be OK. It is for me.
Elevation Accuracy
Roam 2’s elevation accuracy is probably OK. But this chart is strange because it shows me starting and finishing at sea level (I’m at about 12m). However, that 12m gap to the ‘correct’ elevation disappears as I go toward the hill and reappears afterwards. Very strange.
Deep Dive – Supersapiens Support
TL;DR – Roam displays live glucose values and the recent trend. Setup is unusually complicated and requires enabling pairing in both the Supersapiens and Elemnt mobile phone apps. When using Supersapiens, there is no colour coding of glucose values nor are glucose zones available.
Q: Why glucose?
A: As an athlete, you realise that your ability to perform is fundamentally constrained by the availability of fuel and oxygen to burn the fuel. That’s why Wahoo now supports interstitial glucose and muscle oxygen sensors.
Getting Supersapiens to work
Supersapiens are constrained by the unusual technical characteristics of the Abbot glucose sensor at the core of the Supersapiens platform. The sensor isn’t a conventional ANT+ or BLE sensor. If you have a Supersapiens energy band that must first be removed from the Supersapiens app and then linked to the Roam 2, switch over to the Elemnt app and change the Roam 2 setting to enable Supersapiens on it, and all should be good.
Wahoo says a phone doesn’t have to be present, but I couldn’t get it to work unless one were. I’ll have to play with another Supersapiens patch, as I tried some unusual things that may have broken a connection somewhere.
The connection seems robust once it is working.
Bottom Line—You’ll need to have your phone with you when you ride, and if you plan to run afterwards, you’ll still need it, as your Energy Band can’t work simultaneously.
Showing & interpreting Supersapiens’ live glucose data
I couldn’t manually find the Glucose metric in any of the lists of metrics in the ELEMNT app, although it did automatically appear on the Workout Data page. I’ve been afraid to remove it in case I couldn’t find it and add it again!
Understanding fuel (glucose) metrics differs from understanding those for heart rate, pace, or power. Its absolute level is essential, but its direction of travel is also crucial, as it can take your body up to 30 minutes to reverse an adverse trend. It’s also important to know that the Supersapiens reading is updated once a minute.
You should be OK performing easy workouts at 80-110mg/dl (milligrams per decilitre), but more challenging workouts need 110-180mg/dl. Those are the only two zones you need to know about, and they are probably correct for you but can vary.
Q: My glucose is falling, so I need more gels, right?
A: It depends. If you had a gel 15 minutes ago, then no, that hasn’t kicked in yet. If you’re trying harder, then maybe no, though it might depend on how long you intend to keep trying hard. If it’s falling into the endurance zone and you’re doing endurance work, then, again, maybe No. The point is that it’s complicated.
Saving the Glucose data into a FIT file
Wahoo saves the glucose to the workout’s FIT file as a single mg/Dl reading per minute (Source: Wahoo, not tested). This would typically not even be worth writing about as you would assume that you could already do that. But as far as I know, the only other way to export Supersapiens data is via a CSV file from the Supersapiens dashboard. Garmin’s CIQ fields couldn’t do it when I last looked.
Deep Dive – Outdoor Workouts
TL;DR – Execute today’s workout outsides and your target power is converted to a target power range.
Wahoo recognises that maintaining a constant power level is impossible on the road, so Roam converts precise workout power targets into power ranges.
Outdoor workouts are an extension of Wahoo’s ability to follow workouts from training plans from TrainerRoad, Today’sPlan, and TrainingPeaks, and they work on all ELEMNT bike computers. Every Wahoo X workout for the week ahead is synced to Roam 2, and you can choose to follow any of them. Once the scheduled date for any workout has passed, it is deleted from Roam. Thus, this feature effectively requires a subscription to an online training plan. (free Training Peaks allows you to schedule workouts one day in advance).
More: Outside Workouts
Deep Dive – Backup & Restore
If you have ever upgraded a bike computer or were sent a replacement, you’ll know it’s a real PITA to set up the new device just like you had before. Wahoo’s new backup and restore saves the pages and preferences of your ELEMNT bike computers and lets you restore them later. No workout data is saved, which should typically be in the ELEMNT app.
This should work across all ELEMNT bike computers, but for some reason, when I was testing, only a backup from the ROAM 2 showed up.
Summit Segments
[now live]
In a few weeks, all the latest ELEMNT bike computers [ROAM 1, ROAM 2, Bolt 2 only] will get Wahoo’s latest development of hill functionality aimed to guide you better up upcoming hills. It’s similar to the CLIMB features already offered by Garmin and Hammerhead.
Whilst Garmin’s Hill feature works off planned routes and routes created on the device, it doesn’t need the elevation data supplied, as Edge devices already have that on board. Hammerhead Karoo 2 takes Hill climbing features a step beyond Garmin and cleverly predicts the next hill you will climb…you don’t have to navigate or follow a route for this to work on the Karoo. With Wahoo, the feature is more fundamental, and elevation can only be used from routes synced to the ELEMNT.
Wahoo claims the Summit Segments will have these features
- List of individual climbs on your loaded route
- Climb-specific metrics like time-on-hill and vertical-metres-to-go.
Public Route Sharing
[now live]
This new feature is geared towards groups of riders & event organisers and will work with any ELEMNT bike computer. The route is broadcast for anyone with the Wahoo ELEMNT app to grab, sync/follow on their Roam 2.
This feature will become increasingly helpful with an ever-increasing number of riders owning Wahoo bike computers. However, any current route-sharing solution involves everyone using the same app or cloud service. I recall that Garmin allowed route sharing by tapping Edges together (NFC). Again, that’s very clever, but there needs to be a standard that Wahoo and Garmin follow and that any other company can jump onto.
new Wahoo ELEMNT ROAM 2 Specifications Review
The headline specifications show little change from Roam 1.
- Screen – 2.7″ Colour with 64 colours.
- Battery Life – 17 hours with fast charge
- Weight 3.3 Oz
- Water Rating IPX7
- Dimensions – 58.5 x 90.5 x 20.5mm
- Storage: 32Gb (4Gb on Roam 1 and Bolt 2)
- Charging – USB-C
- Magnetic Compass – Yes
- Barometric Altimeter – Yes
- Routable Maps -Yes
- Connectivity – BLE, ANT+, FE-C, WiFi
What’s in the box?
You get a high-quality, clamp-on, out-front, aero-mount for your handlebars which includes a retaining screw which stops the Roam from being twisted on the mount, but this does NOT secure it to the mount. There’s also a cheap stem mount that’s held on with zip ties.
What is missing is a) a lanyard and b) a TT mount for aerobars.
Cost & Availability
There should be wide availability in the larger markets from Day 1.
Like Apple, these market prices don’t tally with each other at the current exchange rates. Either the EU price is too low, or the UK price is too high. Karoo 2 and Roam 2 are similarly priced, but the Edge 1040 is significantly more expensive, and the smaller Edge 530 is notably cheaper.
Take Outs from my review of the new Wahoo ELEMNT Roam 2
2023-24 will likely be more challenging for sports tech companies. The impressive range of Wahoo’s bike tech, including the new Roam, is in a good place for them to weather any economic storms. Wahoo knows what software features to extend over the next few years, and thus, both the ROAM 2 & Bolt 2 are suitable investments and are OK to buy as they are now.
This year seems to mark the point where high-end sports tech includes dual-frequency GPS accuracy as standard, and, in my opinion, this level of Accuracy is excellent for cycling. Maybe it’s even too good for most cycling needs, and Wahoo doesn’t have the option to tone down the Accuracy and boost the battery…I’d take that option if offered, even though 17 hours is already a decent battery life that’s perfectly usable. There’s no need for a performance cyclist to have more than that. Multi-day adventurers might have a different opinion, but they can carry a battery pack or buy a Garmin.
Wahoo hasn’t changed the essence of ELEMNT Roam nor how it materially stacks up against Garmin and Hammerhead. Being played out here with the features is a mixture of novelty and catch-up. Roam 2 is a good step forward for Wahoo, showing progress with product features and hardware competency.
The Supersapiens integration is big news for performance cyclists, but it is unsurprising as Wahoo is a part-owner of the company! Surprisingly, Wahoo writes the Glucose performance data for the FIT file. Sports teams and sports labs will love this feature, and I plan to test that later this week to see any links to platforms like Training Peaks. The Supersapiens integration released today is very much a minimum viable feature. Yet, all that Wahoo can realistically add here in the short term are colour coding to the glucose metrics and introducing glucose zones. Other critical improvements are needed with the connectivity offered by the Abbott sensor. Still, I can’t see that happening any time soon, and it’s beyond the control of Wahoo and Supersapiens.
This is a great bike computer with a decent-sized screen for navigation. But it’s also an excellent performance computer for indoor cyclists and outdoor triathletes alike. If you already have a Wahoo or even a Garmin Edge 530 I can’t see any general reason for you to upgrade or switch but if you are unhappy with whatever you have at the moment then this is one to go for. Along with all my cycling buddies I now use a Wahoo ELEMNT bike computer…so please do take that as a recommendation!
I like the outdoor workout features and will occasionally use the new backup and restore. When public Route Sharing comes, it might help my Sunday group rides, but I’m most looking forward to the new Summit Segments feature.
I think I’ll happily let go my Bolt v2 and get back to “Roam size”, as my aging eyes sometimes have difficulties to see the screen.
It’s a shame that the outdoor WO from SYSTM don’t get pushed to Rival also, has it could be enough to train outdoor….or indoor while controlling the trainer if no device is available to run SySTM 🙂
you can run system with a smartphone app.
but point take. i think wahoo will develop those features on the watch. whether they’ll come to a Rival or whatever follows it IDK but watches are key to their future as a triathlon brand. it’s just that they make all their money right now from the bike stuff
Agree, you can run SYSTM on a phone, but…it would look so much more “polished” if WO could be pushed to the Rival also (swim WO – even if I’m not really convinced by using workouts during swims…too many failures possible, or Run WO from SYSTM…). From my point of view (or a lambda user one), it doesn’t look that much different than pushing on the bike computers. You could even do you SYSTM WO in RGT/Zwift with the turbo trainer being controlled by the watch. Sometimes you just don’t want to reach to your bike computer….
Yet, you can’t use wahoo speed play pedals as a power reference while training with kick… Amazing 🤦
how do you mean?
you can use the powerlink zero power meter pedals as the source of power to control the resistance on a regular kickr and even kickr rollr as well for that matter (google: power matching) i think you can even do that on the kicker 2017?
pretty sure I’ve done that on the roller and fairly sure I’ve used a PM to control a kicker 17 (there’s a setting on one of the apps somewhere)
maybe i misunderstand? try these:
https://www.smartbiketrainers.com/how-to-enable-the-wahoo-kickr-snap-powermatch-feature-and-why-you-should-do-it-5726
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUuW4oUn12s
I think it’s probably more something that has to be on the “training SW side” than on the hardware side.
If the SW doesn’t let you choose “power source” and “controllable” independently…you’re stuck. But I’m not sure that such a SW exists nowadays (Zwift, RGT, SYSTM, Trainerroad…all let ou choose power source and controllable)
I meant exactly what Jeremy responded – wahoo takes smart trainer as a “bundle” – with power source, cad and resistance control in one. THis way you can’t take power from pedals for a reference to control resistance. this is really painful – since power can vary signifiently from gear to gear. That’s the reason why i am not using my wahoo to control the trainer despite the fact their solution is the best – way, way better than solution Garmin is offering (garmin alows other power source as a reference to control trainer though).
Nice review.
When navigate, how speedy is the screen rotation compared to the Roam v1 ?
it’s all noticeably improved.
Wahoo specifically highlighted to reviewers to look out for it. In the side-by-side image in the review I had both devices following the same route, they both were equally as timely when giving instructions and plotting positions but it was the map load, display and detail that was obviously better on the Roam 2.
That’s nice to hear, thanks for the update!
I like the image of the map with a clear outline better on ROAM v1. Pastel colors and the lack of a line on the roads tend to be less pronounced in ROAM v2. However, ROAMv2 does better on a distant map.
feels a slight disappointment at the hardware progress. I was waiting for a 1cm larger screen. Just not to get caught like ROAMv1 when I drive more than 250km.
I think I will wait for ROAMv3 not enough changes to switch from ROAMv1. Too big price difference.
What’s with those huge bezels? I know they like their LED lights, but there’s plenty of room to stretch the screen or make the form factor smaller. I feel like everyone else is minimizing the bezels/form factor and wahoo is willfully ignoring the trend.
yes ultimately a trend is for bezel-less devices. it looks better (Apple Watch? Google Pixel Watch?)
however larger screens change the internal design considerations and add damage risk to the screen edges.
as I’m sure you know, it’s not so simple as just buying a bigger part with a smaller bezel!