UTMB 2023 - The male pros use these GPS watches to race Sometimes we have to take what brand ambassadors say about their tech with a pinch of salt. Gal Gadot was famously caught by Marques Brownlee tweeting about how great her new Huawei phone was...from an iPhone. Oh dear. And of course, we know that even Tour de France cyclists sometimes insist on using some of their personal favourite bits of tech despite conflicting team sponsorships, just that they have to tape over the branding in order to use it in the race. Is it the same for running though? We might be initially inclined to think that a running watch doesn't make that much, or even any, difference to performance. Even on race day, how many key stats do you actually need? eg Joshua Cheptegie used an ancient Forerunner 35 for his 5K world record, most likely it was used as a glorified stopwatch. UTMB adds some other key stat requirements into the mix along with battery consideration as it's a long race with big elevation gains. Cut to the Chase Without further ado. The winner of course wore a Wahoo ELEMNT Rival...yes really! https://the5krunner.com/2023/09/04/wahoo-rival-lowest-ever-prices-for-the-elemnt-triathlon-watch/ UTMB 2023 - Male Props to Jerome at Montre Cardio GPS for the primary research for this data. He analysed photos, Strava uploads, and I think was also present during the race itself to come up with this table of tech. [caption id="attachment_83997" align="aligncenter" width="821"] Source: Montre Cardio GPS[/caption] The one thing these watches all have in common is that they're round! Scratch that. The Apple Watch isn't. Actually, they all do share a barometer which will add accuracy to grade/elevation stats. [caption id="attachment_84003" align="aligncenter" width="1024"] Image: UTMB - is that Canyon Woodward taking a selfie with his iPhone?[/caption] They are generally lightish watches but certainly, even super lightness doesn't seem to be a factor they all share. With the Fenix 7X coming in at almost 100g, that's double the weight of some of the other watches. Only the very latest generation of brands' watches have multi-frequency/dual-band reception, that's the piece of tech that finally gives watches some accuracy when near buildings, cliff faces and the like. surely that's ideal for UTMB2023? Well, the Pace 2, Fenix 6 and Rival don't have that tech. So the pros clearly don't need super accurate GPS tracks; just a vague indication of which mountain they are on seems to be enough! I'm guessing no one got lost at UTMB and that the trails were pretty well-marked! So who needs a navigation watch? All the Coros Pace 2 runners and Baptise Chassagne clearly either followed a breadcrumb route or the person in front, both tactics which are usually fine in my experience ;-) The course is 172 kilometres (106.5 miles) in length and the winners finish in less than 20 hours so even the 965 and Watch ULTRA with their AMOLED screens are perfectly OK for these durations. Well unless Mr Grinius had the map on display 100% of the time with the Apple...the battery might have just about done 5k in that scenario. UTMG - Female Jerome had more difficulty validating what the women wore. On its victory is quoted as saying Jim Walmsley's incredible victory at UTMB is a testament to the power of his determination, unparalleled athleticism, and unwavering dedication. We at Wahoo are honoured to support an athlete whose pursuit of excellence perfectly aligns with our commitment to pushing the boundaries of innovation in sports technology. Jim's much anticipated and well deserved win not only showcases his remarkable talent but also serves as a reminder that with the right tools and mindset, anything is possible. Together, we'll continue to redefine what's achievable in the world of ultra-running. The Moral of this Story I suppose that if we could stop laughing about Wahoo's victory and their ability to invest in the right runner at the right time, we might then be able to make some more sensible statements about the rest. Clearly, Coros has put considerable sums of money into its athlete sponsorship program. It will probably pay off in the long run...just not this time. All that said, perhaps the true moral here is that your precise choice of sports watch these days probably isn't quite as important as it might have been, say, 5 years ago. The current crop of mid to top-end watches are all pretty good from a technical point of view. So maybe it's best to just get one that's the right colour and size for your wrist and your eyesight. Yes, other physical characteristics like general usability, buttons, weather-proofing and screen durability just might be more important than 4,625 software features that you won't ever use. Another cautionary tale for product planners at Garmin perhaps?
