STRAVA Seeks New Funding
Sources close to STRAVA say that the sporting social network company is looking to raise $150-$400m and is seeking to raise those funds from new, private investors which would then value the company at $1 billion, significantly more than one company’s estimate of its worth at $350m.
Key STRAVA Stats, Facts & Guesses
- Privately owned and relatively secretive about its key financial performance stats
- Investors include: Sequoia Capital, Go4it, Madrone Capital Partners and Jackson Square Ventures
- STRAVA has already had 6 rounds of funding but so far only raising $41.9m
- Bloomberg quotes significant recent growth: STRAVA now has 68 million accounts, up from 50 million in February 2020
- It’s not known how many users are paying subscribers. A sensible guess would be significantly less than 10% of total accounts
- In 2019 some estimates put STRAVA as growing by about 1 million new users a month. CV-19 and the associated boom in cycling has caused this rate to significantly increase.
Sources: Bloomberg, Catalano and others
Key Hurdles, Opinion
A price tag of $1bn puts STRAVA beyond the financial reaches of many sports-related companies, especially in the current CV-19 climate. Garmin could afford to buy STRAVA for cash even at that price. I just don’t think they have any incentive for that other than to prevent it from falling into competitor-friendly hands. So then you really have to question WHAT ON EARTH is the exit strategy? Other than a flotation, it’s not obvious.
There could be an exotic buyer like Facebook, Nike, Google or Apple but I just don’t see that happening either. That leaves the most obvious route for Strava as a formal IPO/flotation. This would certainly open up STRAVA’s books for detailed scrutiny and even though Bloomberg says STRAVA is currently profitable, I strongly doubt they are making that much money.
A subscription model has value for STRAVA and, to a degree, will work. However, it’s very unlikely to deliver a revenue stream which alone would justify a $1bn price tag. That’s GOT to come primarily from ads if STRAVA remains in a similar form as at present. The original founders are on the record as saying they don’t see advertising fitting into the business model. In my opinion that is their hidden exit strategy — at some point, they have to be bought out and voluntarily leave.
Yet, even STRAVA’s current subscription strategy is tactically flawed. They are essentially putting ALL meaningful functionality behind a paywall. Fine. That will encourage some to subscribe. BUT it will cause a great many others to simply pack up shop and leave and take their data with them. And that’s STRAVA’s other problem — they need plain old users for that elusive future ad strategy, and user data to make many of STRAVA’s features meaningful like segments, leaderboards and heatmaps.
So there we have it:
- Owners bought out and leave, possibly as soon as the next round of funding
- New investors change strategy to retain a ‘sensible’ free-STRAVA, introduce ads and bolster the subscription service features
- STRAVA becomes an ad company-cum-social media platform mixed with a bit of cycling data
- An IPO in a couple of years time
- Longer-term they are subsumed into one of the other ad companies
Something like that…
Last Updated on 28 May 2026 by the5krunner

tfk is the founder and author of the5krunner, an independent endurance sports technology publication. With 20 years of hands-on testing of GPS watches and wearables, and competing in triathlons at an international age-group level, tfk provides in-depth expert analysis of fitness technology for serious athletes and endurance sport competitors. ID

Google will love to get their hands on that data, but Google would be more interested in users, not paid subscribers. Your public IPO idea seems to fit in best with their current strategy. Seems like they want follow in Peloton’s footsteps with regards to growing company value.
It’s very clear what they’re targeting here: $1B valuation = Unicorn status.
So my guess at this point in time is (1) IPO or (2) sold to someone else.
yep
unicorn: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicorn_(finance)
Announcing or consciously leaking something does NOT always imply that you have a goal that you have just announced or get leaked.
My instinct says that the present owners wanted to put Strava on sale. Not more or not less. They just want to send message for any potential buyers.
Btw successful fund raising does not mean that your company has a bigger worth than the present one. All the new money might be kept as cash for a long while before spending on anything. And anything might be of without value.