Garmin Fenix 7 ☀️ First Thoughts, Solar too

FTC: Affiliate Disclosure: All links pay commissionReading Time: 6 minutes

Garmin Fenix 7 – First Thoughts

Garmin sells millions of Fenix watches and at up to $1,000 a watch, that’s a lot of money. So much money and so much profit that Garmin easily affords to re-invest significant chunks of it in R&D. Every year you get a steady stream of new features and every two years, or so, you get a mostly-new watch on the inside that just so happens to look very similar to the previous one on the outside.

This year is no different, although Covid has made us wait a little longer than we would have liked.

The Garmin Fenix 7 is the best Fenix ever and it is worth the upgrade if you have a Fenix 5 Plus or earlier. Even with a Fenix 6, you should be tempted to upgrade too but it’s not so clear-cut there.

It’s an expensive leap if you want to change from your Coros Vertix 2, Suunto 9 Peak or Polar Grit X watch but there’s no real point in doing that unless you are really missing something important to you in your current watch.

Finally, if all you ever want is the latest, greatest tech then you are just reading this article as a post-purchase rationalisation of the order you already placed at Wiggle, PowerMeterCity, or Amazon.

Garmin Fenix 7 – What’s New?

I’m excited by this. Garmin has done more than enough to get me to buy the Fenix 7.

No Garmin freebies here folks, I buy my own.

Epix Gen 2

Despite looking the same, it’s the hardware that makes up most of the changes that enable greater levels of performance – from a longer-lasting battery to a better heart rate monitor and a better GPS chip. The meaningful sports software features are the same as the Fenix 6 but with a few extra nuggets.

That’s normally the end of the one-paragraph summary. Except today’s announcement also marks another significant move forward for Garmin. The Garmin Connect mobile platform is changing to allow settings to be made on the phone rather than on the device. There’s more! as the CIQ store can now work on the watch with WiFi. This might sound trivial to you but it shows that Garmin is continuing to address one of its biggest weaknesses – a plethora of features that have been historically cumbersome to access on a complex watch menu system.

Let’s crack on with the new highlights. The Garmin Fenix 7 review will come later and cover in more detail what new Fenix owners need to consider.

Key Talking Points

  • New Garmin Elevate Gen 4 optical heart rate monitor – more accurate and more battery-friendly than before. SpO2? You got it. HRV? You got it. EKG/ECG? Hmmm not yet, it seems
  • Latest internal architecture – A complicated way of saying it’s faster, better and more future-proofed for Garmin apps (CIQ).
  • Larger Solar cell area – Giving a c15% bigger solar boost than before.
  • Better Battery Life – Ignoring Solar, battery lives are c25% better across the range.
  • New red/white LED light (Fenix 7X only)
  • New Touchscreens – Touchscreens are standard on every model, you can disable them but you will want to use them when interacting with menus and maps.
  • AMOLED Model – There is a new AMOLED model called Epix Gen 2. It has a very pretty screen and shorter battery life, otherwise, it’s the same as F7.
  • All models are PRO models – Music (inc Spotify), Multi-Continent Topo Maps, Payments & WiFi are on every model.
  • Sapphire models – have twice the storage (for pre-loaded maps) and also only Sapphire models support dual-frequency GNSS
  • New Airoha/MediaTek GNSS/GPS Chip – Multi-Constellation (all models), Dual-Frequency GNSS/GPS (Sapphire only models) is the next step for Garmin toward better positional accuracy. Maximum accuracy settings approximately halve battery life.


  • Subtle aesthetic changes are not worth expanding upon other than to say they exist.
  • Real-time settings sync – Make changes to watch settings on the Connect app, ability to configure and hide groups of settings on the smartphone app. #Sweet
  • Garmin CIQ Store on the watch
  • CIQ now supports data from VO2max, Stress & Body Battery. CIQ ‘4’ (API level 4.0.0) is used.
  • Also added are several new Fenix 6 features like a HIIT sport profile and on-screen animations
  • Just to remind you also get these and more: smart trainer control; PacePro; round trip route creator; trendline popularity routing; VO2max for the trails; daily workout suggestions; recovery advisor; many performance metrics; ABC sensors; battery power manager; body battery; advanced sleep tracking; respiration metrics; hydration tracking; and app notifications.

Here are the new, key sports-related features

  • New Stamina Metric – New screen to aid pacing in running & cycling
  • Visual Race Predictor – Historical trend data for finish times of your target distance as you get fitter
  • UP-AHEAD – Information on upcoming POIs along your route eg distance to aid station, fuel station, finish, checkpoint.
  • SKIVIEW Maps – 2000 ski destinations
  • Health Monitoring Activity (Wellness feature) – Quickly track daily biometric/wellness trends

Garmin Fenix 7 – Key Specs & Options

Garmin Fenix 7S (small)Garmin Fenix 7 (normal size)Garmin Fenix 7X (big)
Resolution240x240px @200PPI260x260px @200PPI280x280px @200PPI
GPS Hours (+Solar)37h (+9h)57h (+16)89 (+32h)
Non-Solar, Solar, Sapphire+Solar, Sapphire Solar TitaniumNon-Solar, Solar, Sapphire+Solar, Sapphire Solar TitaniumSolar, Sapphire+Solar, Sapphire Solar Titanium
various colour & band colour optionsvarious colour & band colour optionsSolar Titanium: Blue, Black/Grey DLC coating

Garmin Fenix 7 Opinion

I love highly capable sports watches and Garmin Fenix 7 undoubtedly gives me that.

In the round, Fenix 7 is simply a better piece of sports kit than anything out there. But that comes at a significant cost that will deter the faint-hearted. Sure you can wait for prices to fall but as we’ve only recently seen with the Fenix 6, waiting for the more significant price falls could keep you waiting for 2 more years.

If you are looking for new navigational or sports features then you will probably be a little disappointed. There is little to see in that sporty respect.

Fear not. More features will follow in 2022/23. Sure the Fenix 6 will get most of them but the older your existing Fenix, the less likely it will be given the newer feature or, indeed, it may simply be unable to run them.

As a Garmin user for over 10 years, I know exactly what to expect from Garmin’s sporting prowess and it is comprehensively good, Fenix has ALL of that goodness.

So what excites me the most are the performance and benefits offered by an optional touchscreen plus the high-resolution screen of the Fenix(Epix2) version. A quality screen and improved interface finally move the Fenix closer to the smartwatch superiority of the Apple Watch.

Garmin Fenix 7 Pricing

Adding Solar, Sapphire and Titanium each bump up the prices. You should seriously consider sapphire to protect the lens and Sapphire is the ONLY way to get the dual-frequency GNSS goodness.

  • Fenix 7/7S – prices start at $/Eu700 (£600) up to $/Eu1000 (£860)
  • Fenix 7X – prices from $/Eu900 (£779) to $/Eu1100 (£1050)
  • Garmin Epix 2 – prices from £800/$900/Eu900 to £900/$1000/Eu1000

19 Jan 2022: The UK/EU links are all now working but everything is sold out and you will need to pre-order – I recommend Garmin, Wiggle, BackCountry or REI.

USA appears to be lacking listed products and is now sold out. When available (now looks like late Jan 2022 onwards), this single link clicks to a choice of retail stores in your country eg Wiggle, PowerMeterCity, Amazon, REI, B&H, Walmart, Competitive Cyclist & Backcountry

On launch day no country site is stating next day delivery. That might change. USA is saying 3 days for Epix (as of 19 Jan) and the UK longer for all SKUs including Epix, with several weeks for some SKUs.

Note: Some retailers DEFINITELY had stock, albeit limited in number (edit: but it’s all gone, everywhere, so it seems)

Reader-Powered Content

This content is not sponsored. It's mostly me behind the labour of love which is this site, meaning it's entirely reader-powered content ❤️ I'd really appreciate it if you'd follow, subscribe or Buy Me A Coffee ❤️ Alternatively please buy the reviewed product from my partners (which costs you no extra) and, for that, I receive a small commission. Thank you! FTC: Affiliate Disclosure: All links pay commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

92 thoughts on “Garmin Fenix 7 ☀️ First Thoughts, Solar too

  1. Ridiculous that those with test units like Ray can’t post yet. Good to see you’re not yet ensnared in their nonsense.

    Really disapointed that the Epix doesn’t have a colour compatible with metal bands. Either have to have a black watch with grey band, a steel watch with Ti band, or a silver ti watch with white plastic. Someone at Garmin should be fired for that given the target demographic for Epix. Even on the Fenix 7 range there’s no longer a bundle with silver metal band, and having had the 3 sapphire, 5, and 5 plus all in DLC grey I am SO over dark watches at this point. Men wearing dark things is such a boring cliche at this point.

    Aside from that this looks like another big step forwards. You said it’s worth the upgrade from 5+ but I’m going to disagree and say 6. Lazy journos (no offence!) say there’s no need to update from the previous version for no other reason than that’s what people with the old one want to hear, yet every single Fenix I’ve ever had (and I’ve had them all) has been a massive step forwards (if I ignore the Solar which was just a minor hardware tweak). This looks to be just as big a change to me and well worth the upgrade from the 6.

      1. I genuinely think it’s another big step. If they’ve done touch well it’ll be huge like you said mapping will be awesome with good zoom.

        That said, there’s a few hours until embargo and I imagine several reviews will be changing from positive to really, really negative right now. I can almost hear the keystrokes from here 😀

  2. “… Garmin sells millions of Fenix watches…” source of this statement? Your mind or any published data? Or just made it up?

  3. Thanks for the summary, it will indeed be interesting to see if the internals have been improved enough to allow for acceptable map scrolling speed, especially with the touchscreen. Apparently the FR945 was already better than the F6 for scrolling.

  4. It will be very interesting to see if any references are made to the potentially missing EKG/ECG capability today. At this price, and give the emergence of it in competing products, I think it is critical that Garmin has it in these models. They may be shipping it in the sensor, but not yet switched on – if that is the case it would be good to know.

      1. It DOES use ECG, as did the original Fenix. Traditional HR straps are ECG. Apple’s in watch ECG is just one implementation and draws a pretty graph. It would be nice to see Garmin add it to the watch, sure, but it’s definitely not a deal breaker for most of their user base, and even on the Apple watch it’s mostly a trivial amusement rather than serious feature.

        1. You cannot directly compare electrical ECG and optical HR. A pulsewave is not the same as an electrical cardiac wave. Sure, they correlate, but for example a heart attack, which can in many cases be measured in an ECG by ST-elevation, simply does not show up in a pulsewave.

          1. Nobody was comparing those, we were all talking about electrical measurement. Unfortunately Apple did their usual thing of “inventing” a slightly worse version of something and pretending it was new. The only thing they meaningfully added was convenience and a pretty graph, but Garmin and especially Polar have had the hardware for years out in the field. Polar even have these for horses available at retail. It would be a trivial firmware update to record a higher resolution graph of the heart and send it over Bluetooth, but then all the fanboys would complain it wasn’t directly on the watch so they can use it in the pub.

  5. I’m all for deferred gratification but only for other people.

    Has anyone seen the Epix on any EU sites? I’ve ordered on Garmin but delivery is 3-5 weeks. On the plus side it’s £56 less on Garmin FR than on Garmin GB.

    1. i suspect garmin will underestimate demand for Epix
      i’m wondering where epix is fulfilled from?
      in the USA the epix is coming in 1-3 days. so I’m thinking they haven’t got any over the Atlantic yet and/or if they do will it go to a European warehouse?
      post-Brext shipping into the UK is actually fairly easy if you are geared up for it (I do it in my other job) and Garmin does this every day.
      tho i was assuming it would be coming from Southampton
      bottom line I’m hoping the stated figures are over estimates.

      sorry, waffling.
      yeah delayed gratification is not for me either. 😉

      1. I’m concerned by the Epix too. Just looking at the 4 colour options suggests they think Fenix will be a lot more popular. Personally I think Epix would have killed Fenix, but given the lack of commitment Epix may well die.

        That could be by design, of course. They have previously done such things to stem demand while component ramp ups happen and niggles are stamped out of the manufacturing process. If that’s the case then Epix might be a one and done like last time then Fenix takes the AMOLED screen for the next iteration. At this point the Fenix screen and better battery life is an extremely niche requirement given how long the Epix lasts

        1. Just ordered from them (well snow and rock) will be interested to see if it actually arrives tomorrow. They are available on Quidco for 2.5% cash back as well, all helps

    2. Be wary of import tax on EU shopping, sometimes it’s not included and the courier company add a nice surcharge onto your order

      1. When buying from the EU, the local EU sales tax should not be charged by the retailer
        instead you should pay a similar amount with import tax and duty (and an admin fee). I think schemes exist for larger companies to prepay this for you (eg maybe amazon)

        however what should happen and what does happen are two entirely different things and you may well end up paying two lots of VAT…you will find it hard to get it back
        I wouldn’t recommend buying to import into the UK, maybe consider at a push. similarly those in the EU would be best not the buy from the uk

    1. Ordered from Bikester (thanks for the link) 2.5 hours ago and the order status has just changed to “Sent” so either they had stock or are telling porkies. Hopefully the former.

      1. My Epix arrived this morning; so two days from order. The display is lovely but it seems tiny after living with an “X”.

      1. How come some random youtuber gets his media loaners but you don’t? Have you had some kind of conflict with Garmin, assuming you get Polar and Coros loaners?

  6. I have had every Fenix since 3 maybe even earlier. The Epix2 with amoled had me very excited – but learning that is was limited to 47mm and not 51mm was very dissapointing.
    I like large watches rough looking. There was rumours that the fenix would have voice/siri support – that would close the smartwatch gap to apple watch quite a bit. The second part I really miss is screen – I would sacrifice battery for amoled quality

    1. 47mm is normal size, 51mm is ‘large/F7X size’
      LTE maybe on a special LTE version in the future which might make up the F& Plus…who knows at this stage? the feature is on Venu so it’s likely fenix will get it eventually.

      1. 51mm was the original fenix size until the fenix 5 redefined it as the 5X size. The f5 being smaller was a big marketing feature but it also messed up the RF — you may recall Stryd dropout and other accessories not working. The motherboard is connected by pins to the bezel which is part of the antenna system. They used to talk about the EXO antenna design and the diameter of the antenna was tuned for GPS reception.

        The 5X was where it started being that the X one had something extra. Maps with the 5X — at expense of significantly compromised battery life. Much more battery range with the 5X plus and 6X. 6X had the *much* larger display and was the only mode with a solar option (gimmick).

        I think to this day the 51mm versions have better RF and GPS reception.

        So while the 47mm versions are undoubtedly more popular I think the “natural” size of the fenix is the 51mm. And that’s the one that always most targets the ultra, mountaineering, and through-hiking space most directly. The 47mm are more oriented for triathletes and others who want a more premium aesthetic than than the f9xx but aren’t impressed with the “ultra” features and put off by the bulk.

        1. yep I kinda agree with most of that.
          The 5X is definitely too big for most of those of use with smaller wrists. If worn over clothing I guess its different.
          For anyone that is REALLY and ACTIVELY using a map on the wrist then the X size certainly makes a lot of sense.
          I do remember the signal dropouts! #Disaster

    1. yes no solar epix
      i was pretty sure there was more than one Epix SKU though , so there is something strange here.
      the other SKU(s) were not solar tho. just minor colour/finish variants

  7. Ordered a black sapphire Epix 2 for delivery tomorrow here in the UK.

    More responsive mapping ie faster hardware in addition to a pretty screen. Look forward to putting it to the test myself!

  8. Standard and Solar 16GB, Sapphire has 32GB.
    Standard and Solar you have to install the Topo maps yourself. Sapphire has them preloaded.
    Can’t see many other differences between the models.

    1. Hallo macht das einen großen Unterschied wenn man nur 16 GB hat? Bekommt man dann alle Karten darauf und hat man noch etwas Platz dann frei?

  9. Nice job with all your predictions/sources!

    Impossible question for you…if the hypothetical 955 actually comes later this year, with running power, do you think they’ll bring power to the Fenix too? I think that’s the only thing that’s holding me back from clicking the buy button this morning (and actually useful lte grumble grumble grumble)

    1. hi, ty for your kind words

      the 955 is real and NOT hypothetical!
      it already has running power via CIQ.
      NATIVE running power is NOT a cert to come but i think it will as sources say it will
      It will then DEFINITELY go to F7/Epix2

          1. The main reason I want the native power support is to eliminate the CIQ field and presumably power-based structured workouts.

            I’m convinced that the CIQ runtime interpreter uses a *lot* more power and memory than native code. It’s also not perfect for isolation. It’s possible for a flaky CIQ app/field/widget/face to burn a lot of power, hang, or even crash your watch. I think that’s why they limit it to 2 fields.

            Note that the Descent disables CIQ entirely during dives — which tells you it isn’t entirely safe. They clearly don’t think it is ok for their liability in a safety-critical context, which should tell you something.

  10. I have the Fenix 6 pro and don’t really see the point in getting Fenix 7.
    Most Software improvements will come to my watch too so in the end all that would count for me is better battery and GPS. But since I have also the Stryd Sensor, the latter is only for cosmetical reasons.

    Could you please let us know, which software version is on your test unit?

  11. There are vast amounts of complaints about GPS and pace accuracy on Fenix 6 Pro (and variants), which many people state are down to Sony chipset, poor antenna and software issues. Two years after release software changes never fixed it. My F6 returned for refund.

    So interested to know about GPS improvements on F7. Any additional info on the changes? If no significant improvements, then at the price, I really can’t see the point in buying.

    1. A significant part of this is because Garmin sells a vast amount of watches. Some devices have defects or manufacturing variability and some people are wankers who need to get outside more and worry less. See also the endless backlight whining.

      GPS is frankly an astonishing technology if you stop and think about it. I think expectations are a little warped. Each point is accurate to around 3-5m. The survey maps also may not be perfectly accurately registered either.

      In aggregate they tend to be accurate within 1% and pace at the granularity of 1km is excellent. Current pace at running speed is a problem. Overpasses, tunnels, urban canyon, real canyons, trees (full of RF-scattering water), heavy rain… these things are also challenges for the technology. That’s what dual-frequency and multi-constellation is working on.

      I think the “current pace” problem is the inherently the least tractable in the list because it is sensitive to a small number of inaccurate points.

      1. >>
        >>A significant part of this is because Garmin sells a vast amount of watches.
        >>Some devices have defects or manufacturing variability and some people
        >>are w****** who need to get outside more and worry less
        Are you suggesting the problems are because of hardware defects introduced in the manufacturing process. Fair comment, so are you saying that if your tracks, pace etc are not accurate then Garmin should automatically replace your watch and if it cannot be resolved then you should be entitled to your money back? That would be acceptable.

        There are a vast amount of complaints about pace and accuracy on F6. This isn’t just a couple of people moaning about nothing. Search for yourself and you will soon get an idea of how wide spread this is. the5krunner has even blogged that “Years ago I gave in on relying on Garmin for accurate pace from GPS (I use stryd)” and in relation to his Fenix 6 Pro says, “I’ve been a little bit shocked to be reminded of the consistent poorness of the track compared to just about all the other devices and I’m still not quite sure how Garmin has gotten away with this for so long.”

        I appreciate the technology behind GPS, I realize the problems with overpasses, tunnels, canyons and the accuracy of maps. But you cannot blame overpasses, maps, the weather if other watches are consistently more accurate. If you were to go out with a running group and your F6 is the only watch that shows the problem you question why. So you look into it and find out there are a lot of people unhappy with the F6. It is an expensive watch so as you would appreciate it is somewhat unacceptable that it should be less accurate than a cheaper watch, especially other cheaper Garmin watches. If other watches are always more accurate then do we assume the F6 either has a defect or that it just was not designed very well?

        It appears that some other manufacturers’ watches (and some other Garmin watches) have what is perceived as more accurate pace and distance. Yes, there are also watches that are worse and someone using a F6 after a worse watch is unlikely to be disappointed.

        Searching around it seems that the 745 has more accurate pace/distance than the F6. I have read the possible reasons why – plastic case instead of metal etc. Of course, you could rightly say the F6 has maps and many other features, which justify the higher price, but it appears not to be as accurate. I question why so much more to get extras when the basics aren’t as good. Of course, if a buyer knows this in advance and it does not concern them then ok – it is their choice.

        IDK whether Garmin has officially stated if the F7 uses a different chipset to the F6, or whether the antenna design is different or whether there are GPS software improvements compared to the F6 or whether the choice of material for the case means the satellite signals are better or whether any of this matters and actually leads to an improvement over the F6. IDK how the multi-band F7 compares to the ‘cheaper’ F7 versions. IDK if the cheaper versions use the same chipset as the F6? IDK if the cheaper F7 versions are as bad as the F6? If the cheaper F7 uses the same hardware as the F6 but is considerably more accurate can all those F6 owners who have a problem soon expect a software change which stops them from expressing their displeasure.

        Anyway, blah blah blah, whatever… I, like many others, simply want to know BEFORE we even consider buying so we can make an informed choice so when we do “get outside more” we know we can “worry less”.

        1. Hey get down off that fence and say what you think ! 😉

          I agree with all that.

          When spending $1000 on anything you expect it to be fit for purpose. in the UK a failure for a product to do that, i believe, is reason in itself to return it.
          surely a top-end running watch should tell you how fast you are running. it is THE most basic thing. same argument for an optical HRM as a means of pacing, readiness and quantifying load.

          I think the problem is more nuanced though. Garmin’s products are definitely not the most accurate but they are not that far behind in the circumstances in which i test them (I don’t test in mountains and need to test more in urban areas). so even if the Airoha chip, confirmed by DCR, brings more accuracy will it be just a ‘bit more accuracy or a step change?

          I am just not convinced that Garmin will improve things that much (I’ll report back soon). If they wanted to I suspect they could match ambit 3 levels of performance but most people don’t really care about accuracy and that’s why they haven’t historically worried about it too much (I care, you care and Brian cares but LOTS of others don’t)

          “chest strap and Stryd” is likely to remain my mantra.

          having had my moan as well. I think this new chip CAN help matters in mountains based on what I’ve seen from Coros – and Garmin can certainly do as well there if they want to.

          urban canyons are also tricky and there are still more GPS tricks that can be played beyond the tech that Garmin supports in F7. but we are running out of tricks that can be played

          PS: Just to avoid doubt, my F6 Pro is particularly bad. The FR745 was particularly good.

          1. I have had 2 fenix 6X. The first one started to have reduced battery performance after 2 years and then started freezing and rebooting during activities. The battery has charge cycle limits and that’s life. I believe that the gaskets were compromised and they led to the systemic failure. I had a lot of time in the mountains of Southern Africa with my 6X and it took some knocks. Never scratched or cracked the screen though.

            2 years is about the life I experience and expect from these things. A little more would be nice but I’m amazed by people still rocking an F3 and it is in working condition

            In any case both f6X I had had reasonable GPS performance. Better than the 5X which had one notable freak out of insanity during a race and would deflect notably with reflections of signal off of tall buildings or cliffs.

            I’m not saying it is amazing. I’m saying acceptable and with the battery range at that generation of tech, it was top notch engineering trade-offs of battery, accuracy, and durability.

            I gave up on the Garmin current pace long ago. Could Garmin do better — yes I think there are simple smoothing rolling average algorithms that would give better steady-state readings. But I don’t know if that would be a problem for interval paces? Anyway I use a Stryd on the road.

            I don’t trust the wrist HR sensor for workouts. I have had too many occasions of total nonsensical readings for minute at a time. I use an H10 for every workout.

            I use TrainingPeaks LT2 estimate (not Garmin’s) and the Joe Friel zone calculations, not Garmin’s. I have decided that Garmin is much better at collecting data than giving training advice. I think Polar is better as a first party but TP is the gold standard, unless you are going down the rabbit hole of Golden Cheetah and Kubios.

            My sense is there are some people who are not pleased got bad units and those should be replaced under warranty. Some people are just unreasonable and will never be pleased (see also backlight-gate). If you sell through a lot of units those are large numbers of people. People with an axe to grind post a lot on forums while pleased customers are out on the trail, road, and bike.

            I also have a strong suspicion, though no personal experience, that the 6 and 6S are worse at GPS than the 6X because they have smaller antennas. The original engineering antenna and case design were for a 51mm case and the bezel is and was part of the RF system.

            I have had good and reliable but not amazing performance on the 6X with GPS+Galileo (the default) and GPS-only (although this was over Ultra distance in mountains so minor wobbles would not be that obvious. However I didn’t get lost which was a win.

          2. If I was more price sensitive, I would probably be on the Coros Vertix or Vertix 2. There is no question Garmin is maximizing their ARPU by manipulating the fenix SKUs to bundle desirable feature in the more expensive models.

  12. See absolutely nothing worth to upgrade, will wait for Fenix8. In general it looks like OHR technology and HRV based metrics reached its limits and there is nothing more to offer for better training…

  13. for my current watch – the Garmin Fenix 6 pro – the improvements are not enough to make it worth buying. Simply better battery and GPS is not enough, since I also have the stryd running sensor which gives accurate pace.

    could you tell us the software version used on the Fenix 7?

  14. Thanks for the summary.
    Do you know if the Fenix/Epic still only allow 2 Connect IQ datafields during an activity?

  15. Need a Bluetooth connection to some brand of smart glasses, or better yet, smart goggles. Who actually reads maps and other information from a tiny watch face while running/hiking/biking/swimming/…??

    Will reserve judgement on GPS improvements. All I know is that in urban environments it’s pointless due to scattering caused by tall buildings. Useless for pacing in marathons held in cities like Chicago, or New York. If nothing else, it should have a smoothing function and/or the ability to change/remove the jagged path that currently results. Maybe tie into 5G for better tracking in cities?

    1. FORM Goggles do that ! same guys did a HUD for cycling. Di2 is also good for hands free control of head unit and i think Bryton do bike voice control of the head unit to a degree

      GPS in cities is a problem – footpods and my features like Suuno ghost Racer could be a solution for some

  16. So when are we actually expecting the embargo to be lifted for US/Canada and Epix and Fenix 7 to be available at the major retailers?

      1. I was able to get on on the website (Canada), 7x solar sapphire, all black. Gray DLC all sold out.

        Got on chat with the rep – he said some restocking would become available Feb 25, primarly the sold out EPIX.

        Best Buy – our big retailer here – has them all Available for preorder

        Release Date: April 15, 2022

        That’s either a precaution until they get a firm date of a few days, or really bad that there is a 3 month wait for the watches….

          1. The one thing I noticed on Best Buy – and this might mean something so I suggest checking it out!

            IF you click on the watch – ex. EPIX. It says pre-order for April 15, 2022.

            However, some of the watches, like the black EPIX say – AVAILABLE 5. I just ordered one to test and now it says, AVAILABLE 4, so def my purchase.

            Some of the SKUs don’t have that available number. So definitely something here….

            I am hoping that they are taking pre orders but MIGHT have a few in stock, otherwise, not sure why they would state that. I will report back if I get a shipped (fingers crossed) notification!

  17. When looking at all the features today, I’m happy. I’m happy that I made the switch from Enduro to Vertix 2 a month ago (as Vertix 2 was on sale for 595 EUR!) and there is actually nothing big in F7 that makes me regret my move. After the “detox” from the Garmin ecosystem (and it was tough for a while), I like the COROS for some unknown reason 🙂

    1. interesting, thank you
      If you consume data mostly on the watch and never the app then I guess Coros is great for that. if you like the rotating crown…even better , as it works well.

      1. I’m actually a big data geek (or thought I was), but the very basic info provided in the COROS app is actually 99% enough for me. The same is with COROS Training Hub. After living without Garmin for 2-3 weeks, I realised that I totally don’t need all the overwhelming data that Garmin provides. Sure, I miss body battery widget (and some other “nice to have” features), but that’s a Garmin’s black box stuff without some publicity available scientific backing. I have found that COROS morning HRV is much better indicator on my upcoming morning run than body battery.
        I’ve more than half way through on putting together an extensive summary on how the transition from Garmin to COROS was for one local wearables / blog site and that has helped me to put my pros and cons in a structured way 🙂

          1. Hasn’t Garmin had HRV Stress test which requires a ECG chest strap and there is an option to log HRV. Presumably you then analyze those logs with Kubios or something. I don’t think Garmin does anything with that.

          2. yes i think that’s right.
            i dont know if body battery accepts readings from the strap (if it did it would be wrong as it would then not be comparing like with like)
            either way most people will be taking the stress readings based on the oHR sensor (I don’t, but most do)

  18. no support of ultrawideband, i guess. uwb is the next step replacing bluetooth first for audio, next for sensors. so i‘ll wait for next gen fenix 8 (i own a fenix 6 saphire)

  19. Seems a bit odd that the (upper model) Epix only gets a (boring) black and white model in addition to basic, non-sapphire versions. Any thoughts on whether more colors/alternatives could be expected anytime soon?

    And for the missing ECG feature; would it in any case not make more sense to include this in a strap, which could then measure constantly while wearing during an activity? From a health/safety perspective this seems more useful than a brief reading while not in activity…

    1. i see the Epix as more of a branch off the main hierarchy. so 7x titanium sapphire would be top.

      ecg would only ever be a single point reading but placing a finger on the start button. it wouldn’t be a continual use thing.
      the finger would form a ‘single lead’ (I think that’s the right terminology). medical grade devices have multiple leads effectively i think taking multiple simultaneous readings to build up a detailed and true picture of the beat…something like that.

      1. Correct, which is why it probably would make more sense to incorporate a (continuous) reading into a chest strap HRM (third party exists already), rather than a gimmick-function on the wrist.

        Would still hope for some more exiting colors of the epix for the fashion-oriented among us, even if the 7x is top (going for a 7/7x/s without Amoled is a no-go after seeing them next to each other).

  20. Did the 7s really get thicker? That would be a serious step back as the 6s is not a thin watch already.
    Very disappointed as I would buy something slimmer right away despite the so far disappointing features

  21. I think the most important features that everybody wants on his previous gen Garmin watch is the ability to customize sports profiles, settings…Etc on GC App.
    And frankly, this is by far the biggest feature of the F7, as far as I can tell 🙂
    (and even more importantly, it’s a hint that we’ll get his on Edge bike computers also for the XX40 series…probably with power glass on the 1040 too…)

  22. do you expect garmin to release an update to the tactix delta (tactix echo?) soon in conjunction with the 7x?

    1. I don’t know about ‘soon’ but I would bet they will release one at some point over the next 2 years. Check the delay from the fenix 6 to the Delta, it will likely be a similar delay to the Echo from today

  23. Yes this one is the “Exclusice line” for watch dealers. I have one on order. It just looks gorgeous, doesn’t it 😉

  24. Does the F7 Saphire have maps preloaded for the whole world? In Ray’s vid, the graphic of map sizes seem to total more than 32GB?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.