
What’s the Cap on Human Energy Expenditure? Elite Athletes Reveal ‘Metabolic Ceiling
When athletes devote large amounts of energy to running or cycling, they unconsciously reduce energy output elsewhere.
Ultra-runners face a limit on how much energy they can expend.
The human body has a ‘metabolic ceiling’ that even extreme athletes cannot surpass. A recent study in the journal Current Biology finds that over 30 weeks or more, the ceiling is about 2.4 times an athlete’s basal metabolic rate (BMR), the minimum amount of energy the body needs daily for essential tasks, such as breathing.
People can burn up to about ten times their BMR for short periods. Researchers have previously proposed that the body has a metabolic limit of around 2.5 times BMR over extended periods. Still, it has never been tested adequately until now, says Andrew Best, a biological anthropologist at Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts in North Adams and a co-author of the work.
Best and his colleagues recruited 14 high-endurance athletes — ultra-runners, cyclists and triathletes. Participants drank doubly labelled water containing deuterium and oxygen-18, heavy hydrogen and oxygen isotopes. Once ingested, both deuterium and oxygen-18 will be lost from the body in the form of water, through urine and sweat. However, some oxygen-18 will also exit the body through exhaled carbon dioxide.
By tracing the quantity of these molecules flushed out in urine, the scientists were able to calculate the amount of CO2 exhaled, and, from this, estimate the number of calories the athletes burned. According to Best, this allowed the team to trace the athletes’ energy output as they competed in real time, rather than measuring them on treadmills in a laboratory.
Hitting the ceiling
During multi-day competitions, some athletes burn around 9,000 calories a day; however, over more extended periods — 30 and 52 weeks — their energy expenditure averaged about 2.4 times their BMR. The results show that even the most extreme athletes reach a metabolic ceiling that is challenging to exceed.
The researchers also found that when athletes devote more energy to running, cycling, and swimming, they unconsciously cut back on using energy elsewhere, such as walking or fidgeting.
Nigel Turner, a metabolic researcher at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, says that doubly labelled water, the gold-standard method for measuring energy expenditure, allowed the team to get accurate estimates of energy output on athletes’ real activities. Best says doubly labelled water has only recently become affordable, making the study possible.
Turner says one factor that probably limits prolonged exertion is nutrient intake, because that also requires energy. Past research has suggested that humans can only metabolise the caloric equivalent of about 2.5 times their BMR.
If energy expenditure exceeds 2.5 times BMR for a prolonged period, the energy intake of athletes wouldn’t be able to keep up, and they would have to start using body stores, which could include muscle breakdown…This would, in turn, potentially compromise performance.[Turner]
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-03389-7
References
- Best, A., Sadhir, S., Hyatt, E & Pontzer, H. Curr. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2025.08.063 (2025). Article Google Scholar
- Westerterp, K. R. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 3183–3187 (2001). Article PubMed Google Scholar
- Thurber, K. et al. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw0341 (2019). Article PubMed Google Scholar
Last Updated on 30 January 2026 by the5krunner

tfk is the founder and author of the5krunner, an independent endurance sports technology publication. With 20 years of hands-on testing of GPS watches and wearables, and competing in triathlons at an international age-group level, tfk provides in-depth expert analysis of fitness technology for serious athletes and endurance sport competitors.

I think this is in line with what Herman Pontzer wrote in the book Burn. He even went as far to suggest that pregnancy is also constrained by this energy expenditure, because it would start to be impossible to sustain 2 organisms much beyond the usual 40 weeks.
idk
a mate of mine works at Springer (publisher) and sneds this stuff through. its very recent
Ponzer is one of the writers of this paper I believe. According to the podcast I posted below there are two papers that have come out in recent days that do not exactly line up. One of them is coauthored by Ponzer.
The Real Science of Sport went over this. Great discussion
https://youtu.be/6PVtJwDEo0U?si=tb6Zu2D_BsIXyfSU