Ravemen FR300 vs FR160 – Comparison and Review

Ravemen FR300 Review

I used the Ravemen FR160 from April 2024 to November 2024, stopping when the mount broke because of the weight of the Wahoo ELEMNT ACE I used it with. The lugs on the underside of the Ravemen broke, rather than those on the ELEMNT ACE.

This was a handy opportunity to try out the larger and better-specified FR300, plus have a go at repairing the FR160. Here’s a comparison of the two models and a review of the Ravemen FR300.

TL; DR – All the minor annoyances of the FR160 have been improved by the FR300

 

How does the FR160 compare to the larger FR300?

There are more differences than the obvious ones implied by the larger FR300 having a higher capacity battery.

Bigger is better?

The battery capacity in the FR300 is three times that of the FR160.

In real-world usage, Ravemen claims that the maximum brightness is almost doubled, and battery lives increased by one-third to one-half. Staring in the flashing mode during the daytime is more painful and notably brighter at nighttime. I was happy with the FR160; I used it only as a daylight awareness light so drivers could easily see me. The improvements make FR300 more of an allrounder, though far brighter lights are available.

 

Feature Ravemen FR300 Ravemen FR160
Max Lumen Output 300 lumens 160 lumens
Lighting Modes 3 constant, 3 flashing 3 constant, 3 flashing
LED Type COB COB
Wide-Angle Lens Yes, with side visibility Yes, with side visibility
Battery Capacity 1,200mAh rechargeable Li-polymer 380mAh rechargeable Li-polymer
High (Constant) Up to 2.5 hours (300 lumens) Up to 2 hours (160 lumens)
Medium (Constant) Up to 4 hours (150 lumens) Up to 3 hours (80 lumens)
Low (Constant) Up to 8 hours (50 lumens) Up to 5.5 hours (40 lumens)
Flashing (Day) Up to 16 hours Up to 10 hours
Flashing (Night) Up to 20 hours Up to 13 hours
Charging Port USB-C (+bike computer charging) USB-C
Auto On-Off Mode Yes No
Mode Memory Function Yes Yes
Compatibility Garmin+Wahoo adapters included Optional adapters for Wahoo/Bryton
Water Resistance IPX6 IPX6
Dimensions 82mm x 60mm x 25.5mm 75mm x 57mm x 21mm
Weight 81g 55g
Tether Included Yes No

Pros

The charging port has a neat feature that allows power discharge. This means you can charge your bike computer even as you ride if you have a spare cable.

Also handy is the auto-off feature. I sometimes left the FR160 on in the hallway when I got back and had a shower, inevitably leading to it fully discharging before I got around to putting my bike away properly. Only then, on my next ride, I find the battery flat.

The tether is nice to have for me. Almost all my bike computers have their tether, so I didn’t need another for the Ravemen. But it might give you an option.

A new tweak sees the power button moved from the end (next to the USB port) to the side, making it easier to turn on/off.

Cons: Downsides

A minor downside is the charge time. It’s only an issue if you find it flat at the start of a ride and need to charge it quickly. You’d need at least 15 minutes of charging to get enough juice in night flash mode for a couple of hours.

The major downside for my usage is that the FR300 is quite big. I’m more bothered by its aesthetics, ensuring whichever bike computer I use looks fine alongside large bike computers like ELEMNT ACE. Still, smaller ones such as Edge 520 and Bolt 2 are too similarly sized to FR300 for my liking. Something like the Roam 2 is acceptable from a size perspective.

Repairing the FR160 – Simple

Ravemen sell spare parts, and it was simply the case of undoing a couple of bolts and swapping the new mount lugs. One minute later, all was good with the FR160.

Take Out

I see no reason to upgrade from FR160 to the FR300 unless you want or need a specific feature. As a daylight awareness aid, I still believe the FR160 is fine.

That said, the FR3000 is a better light – it’s better or at least as good in every feature. It’s only the large size that you might want to think about before getting the visa card out.

 

Buy Ravemen FR300

Ravemen FR300 Review Take Out

Ravemen Fr300 Vs Fr160 - Comparison And ReviewThe FR300 is a straightforward job that does a simple job and does it well.

Like most electronic sports products, it has become yet another device to charge, but I’ll take that hit for the boost in safety.

 

 

Last Updated on 28 January 2026 by the5krunner



Reader-Powered Content

Buy me a coffee

This content is not sponsored. It’s mostly me behind the labour of love, which is this site, and I appreciate everyone who supports it.

Support the site: Follow (free, fewer ads) · Subscribe (paid, ad-free) · Buy Me A Coffee ❤️

All articles are written by real people, fact-checked, and verified for originality. See the Editorial Policy. FTC: Affiliate Disclosure — some links pay commission. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

2 thoughts on “Ravemen FR300 vs FR160 – Comparison and Review

  1. I have the FR160 for my =<3 hour bike rides. I love it, it is sleek, good build quality and light is enough. I think the FR300 would be to big for my use case. Would like them to have a similar designed rear light which I can attach to a Garmin (varia) quarter-turn mount. Like Garmin TL 300 (not on sale anymore) or Magene L308 (do not need the emoji stuff).

  2. It’s not exactly “aero” but the rockbros battery light is a much better buy. I bought the 5000mah version for around $20.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *