Did Polar or Suunto perform better in 2025?

They performed differently, not directly comparably. Suunto returned to profit and grew revenue 26.95%, while Polar’s losses widened on flat revenue. But Suunto’s profit included an unrealised currency gain and negative operating cash flow, while Polar’s weaker numbers carried no such qualifications.

Which company cut research and development spending more?

Suunto. It cut R&D by 30.8%, from 10.7 million euros to 7.4 million euros. Polar held its R&D budget flat at 20.2 million euros despite cutting other operating costs by a fifth.

Is Polar or Suunto financially stronger?

Neither is clearly stronger. Polar’s net worth is larger but fell 54% in a year. Suunto’s net worth was still negative at year-end but had narrowed sharply and was resolved entirely after year-end when its parent converted a loan into equity.

How does Amazfit's 2025 revenue compare to Polar and Suunto?

Amazfit’s parent, Zepp Health, reported 258.9 million US dollars in revenue for 2025, more than Polar and Suunto combined, though the figures aren’t directly comparable because of different currencies and disclosure requirements.

Why isn't Coros included in this comparison?

Coros is privately held and does not publish audited financial accounts, unlike Polar, Suunto and Zepp Health, which are all subject to public filing requirements.

R&D spending Archives -

Polar vs Suunto vs Amazfit – 2025 Finances Compared

13 September 2026

the5krunner

Polar, Suunto and Amazfit all filed 2025 accounts within weeks of each other. Here's how their…