Polar issues rebuttal to Whoop’s Trade Dress Infringement Allegations

Whoop vs Polar logos, runner with Polar LOOP band

Polar has publicly denied Whoop’s claims of Trade Dress infringement, as detailed in a statement to this site.

Polar firmly denies any allegations of intellectual property infringement. Our products are the result of decades of innovation and rigorous design processes, and we remain confident in the originality and integrity of the appearance and design of our products. [Polar, 20 October 2025]

Background & Context

There appears to be an unusual number of IP cases between sports and wearables companies at the moment, Whoop vs. Polar is the latest. All involve infringement of intellectual property rights to some degree. Normally, this is due to patent infringement related to inventions. Whoop’s two cases cover a different area of IP law—Trade Dress. This is where an established product’s ‘distinctive look’ is broadly copied by a competitor, either intentionally or otherwise.

Thoughts

There are differing degrees of merit in all cases. None of the defendants have backed down.

These are potentially consequential cases. Think back to the widely reported Apple vs. Massimo patent case. That was ‘only’ for the SpO2 sensors part of the Watch, a relatively unimportant component. However, the court ruling stopped Apple Watch imports for a while and required Apple to disable the feature, with knock-on effects on other algorithms. Apple eventually designed a fix that ran the same algorithm on the smartphone rather than the Watch!.

Other than financial damages, the worst case scenario for Polar is that it has to stop selling Polar LOOP in the USA.

For the complete guide to Polar watches, sensors and training science, see the Polar hub on this site.

For context on the Polar Loop’s position in the screenless recovery band category, including how it compares to Whoop, Amazfit and the Fitbit Air, see our complete category guide.

Polar LOOP Review: Accurate, But Not a Whoop Competitor

In the Strava vs. Garmin case, there is the (unlikely) potential for Strava to go out of business should Garmin restrict access to its APIs, even though it is Strava bringing the case. If the case goes the other way, Strava seeks to stop Garmin sales with devices that use heatmap/segment features, but I would say that outcome is impossible.

The Suunto/Garmin case has hardly been reported, yet it is perhaps the most significant. Suunto is claiming fundamental infringement of 5 areas of its IP. If Garmin had to stop using the features in question, the outcome would be catastrophic but unlikley – more likely would be financial damages and the requirement to pay a licencing fee, which Garmin could afford.

Last Updated on 3 October 2026 by tfk the5krunner


Small things I always use

Watches and sensors

On the bike

Home and indoor training

  • NPE Runn: Makes my basic treadmill smart, sending more accurate speed and distance to my watch and Zwift. I use it.
  • Google Wifi: Keeps Zwift connected in my pain cave. I use it.
  • Apple TV 4K: Zwift on the big screen. I use two.
  • Google Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen): My video doorbell, running in both Google Home and Apple Home. I use it.

Health, recovery and sleep



Reader-Powered Content

Buy me a coffee

This content is not sponsored. It’s mostly me behind the labour of love, which is this site, and I appreciate everyone who supports it.

Support the site: Follow (free, fewer ads) · Subscribe (paid, ad-free) · Buy Me A Coffee ❤️

Written by real people, with AI assistance. Fact-checked and verified for originality. See the Editorial Policy. FTC: Affiliate Disclosure — some links pay commission. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *