Sports tech in 2025 – What I’m looking forward to
Mass levels of technical innovation in the sports tech industry feel as if they are slowing down.
Companies are moving forward by tweaking and improving the usability of their products and adding a single tech component when they become available. As examples of that, we’ve seen Garmin focus on usability (Fenix 8, Edge 1050), we’ve seen the mass adoption of high resolution, vivid AMOLED touchscreens, and we’ve seen multi-constellation, dual frequency chipsets become a norm – and an accurate one at that.
We’ve also seen improvements in wellness sensors and insights, but many of those feel they only add ‘meh’ levels of improvement, at least for athletes.
Looking forward to 2025, I don’t see a step change in progress. I expect more usable devices and apps. But I also feel confident we will start to see new tech in microLED screens.
With that in mind, here are the products I hope and expect to excite me in 2025.
Garmin Edge 850 / 550
I’ve used the Edge 540 and Edge 1050 this year. I have to say the button-only Edge 540 was an awful experience; my wrist is only recovering from the contortions required for its many button presses and poor overall UI. Against that is the Edge 1050, which has a touchscreen and next-generation interface. It’s pretty good. Very good, in fact.
Inevitably, the Edge x50 series will be expanded to a cheaper model in 2025 – mostly likely in spring. This means we will see an Edge 850, which will probably be well worth buying, and we might see an Edge 550 alongside that. I’m sceptical that Garmin will take the button-only access for the 550 to the new interface any more seriously than it did for the 540. I hope I’m wrong.
Expectation: Edge 850 – Exciting! 550…less so.
Garmin Forerunner 975
Fenix 8 saw a new user interface, which will be added to new Forerunner/Fenix watches but not rolled down to most older models. Fenix 8 and several other watches have the Gen-5 Elevate optical HR sensor (2023).
The Gen 5 Elevate can only take a one-off ECG reading, which is useless. At least, to me, it is. It is, nevertheless, an improved sensor, and it’s always nice to have the latest and greatest bits of tech on my wrist.
I wear and use my Forerunner 965 triathlon watch and like it. It’s not perfect, but if an asteroid fell on the Garmin factory tomorrow and I could never get another Forerunner, I would be happy to keep using the FR965 until it fell apart. It’s a great workhorse.
But I’d like a prettier, slightly improved workhorse if there’s one going.
The Garmin Forerunner 975 is due in 2025, and it will certainly have a new user interface and Gen-5 optical HR. Hopefully, there will be some other goodies, too.
Expectation: Forerunner 975 – Exciting!
Apple Watch 11, Apple Watch Ultra 3, Apple Watch SE Gen 3
This year’s Apple Watch failed to add any new components of sporting significance, but all recent Watch models did get a very nice sports software bump with Watch OS11.
To me, the interesting thing about Watch 10 was one of its superficially most boring aspects – its sizes. Watch Series 10 has had a case size and shape redesign; there is NO WAY that Apple will change the 42mm and 46mm sizes until 2027. As a result, the core 18-hour claimed battery life is here to stay until then. Sure, a few components like a microLED screen or solid-state battery could bump it up ‘a bit’, but ‘a bit’ would be just above 24 hours, and Apple probably wouldn’t even bother changing its 18-hour claim.
Watch 10’s S10 chipset also failed to get any AI boost. Such AI boosts have made their way to many of Apple’s latest chipsets on its other pieces of tech.
I look forward to handing over my Watch 10 to my partner in 2025 and getting the LTE version of Watch 11. I expect it might get improved accuracy from dual-frequency positioning and Apple’s next generation of optical HR.
Expectation: Watch 11 – Meh! I’m going to be broke buying all this stuff. At least I love to use it.
There will almost certainly be a Watch Ultra 3 and SE Gen 3. Just look at Apple’s financials for Q3. The wearables didn’t do well, probably because these models were not refreshed this year. I’ll buy the Ultra 3 alongside the Watch 11, and if Apple makes a smaller Ultra 3 option, I might keep that for me. But I’m not holding my breath. SE Gen 3 might be cheaper for kids who you want to get teched-up into the Apple ecosystem.
Continental GP6000
This is not electronic tech, but I’m excited as it is sporting performance progress.
Most keen cyclists I know opt for the existing Continental GP5000 tyres, which have low rolling resistance (RR), weight and decent grip. There are various flavours, like the lighter TT version that lowers RR and a heavier TLR version that replaces the weight and risk of an inner tube with the weight and risk of sealant (hmmm). I like and use Pirelli as well.
I’ve been lucky to use the state-of-the-art Continental Aero 111 this year, which adds a bit of weight, a bit of grip, and a tad more RR – and creates watts (claim: sail effect). Theoretically, it is better and faster overall because of its aerodynamic tread profile. You might scoff, but aero wheels and tyres significantly affect your performance. I won a GB national-level, age-group multisport event this year and used the Aero 111 (I don’t normally win decent races, but I did go up a group). I’ve also had some bizarre 2-hour PBs/PRs on some of my regular loops with this tyre when my fitness and fatigue levels would have predicted otherwise. The aero boost that the Aero 11 is supposed to deliver could be part of the explanation.
Anyway, I reckon the tread profile and improved Black Chili compound will make their way onto Continental’s next generation of performance road tyres in 2025 – i.e. the GP6000 range.
Expectation: If you are a performance cyclist, you should perhaps get excited; I already have some 🙂
Whoop Strap 5
Whoop has a unique band-based offering for many athletes seeking recovery assessment and sleep & training guidance. They have a subscription-only service, part of which bags you a free hardware upgrade when they decide to iterate a new one. And one is now overdue.
Whoop is an interesting company that tends to innovate where it can. Its scope for extensive innovation is limited by the band format, which has only a limited number of components. But I would expect Whoop to push out the Boat of Innovation of the components and use them where possible. Perhaps more so than most companies.
Expectation: I am quite excited by the prospect of Whoop 5
A New Varia Rear RADAR smart light
I loved the original Varia RTL510 (2016) so much that I bought the RTL515 (2020) because it had a slightly better battery. It’s the best safety tool I’ve got and rarely throws out a false negative (it DOES do some), but it seems to detect vehicles more accurately than the competition. Other than the Bontrager alternative, I’ve tried them all.
However, the battery on the RTL515 is one of my perennial banes. It lasts well over 10 hours, but I do many multi-hour rides up to 160km. So it doesn’t last many rides, and I always get RADAR battery warnings. The simple solution is for Garmin to double the size of the battery and be done with it. I’ll take the weight hit.
An RTL520 would be due now based on a 4-year refresh cycle, but I’m not holding my breath. Garmin wants to produce premium products with niche tech, which led to what I consider to be the mostly useless rear-facing radar-light camera of the RCT715.
Expectation: I expect nothing here but hope for an RTL520.
microLED display for Garmin Fenix 8 and TAG Heuer Connect E5
I expect a microLED screen to appear for the first time next year on at least one high-end wearable. The economics of microLED only seem to work for devices around the $1,000 price point or above.
TAG Heuer is heavily rumoured to be adding one to its next-gen Connected E5 (based on WearOS3), and Garmin has had three leaks that confirm a working prototype of the Fenix 8 based on microLED.
microLED will make a notable difference in battery life. A ballpark figure would be a 20% improvement, other things being equal. microLED has other benefits, perhaps best realised in subsequent years with the Apple Watch, where edge-to-edge screens are needed.
Expectation: I expect microLED watches from both TAG and Garmin, though I’m not entirely sure why I’m excited by the prospect
> Expectation: I expect microLED watches from both TAG and Garmin, though I’m not entirely sure why I’m excited by the prospect.
MicroLed:
– higher resolution that even Amoled, according to rumours
– lower power usage
– no risk of burn-in
For me, that’s enough.
🙂
yeah there are few other technical characteristics I covered last month and in other places (https://the5krunner.com/2024/09/23/garmin-microled-display-au-optronic-in-mass-production-now/ )
ultimately tho it is the power saving that will make the Apple Watch more bearable and the Fenix last that little bit longer…perhaps even to the point where it makes MIP pointless?
the resolution will only help if the vendors use it. eg better garmin watch faces, eg Apple Watch improving live video (eg from doorbell)
burn=in – that’s what they say but i would imagine all these types of display degrade to some degree.
Yep, I believe that availability (in Fenix, not Marq-prices) will drive MIP to really extreme use cases (much more so than today). I’m still on MIP, but – assuming it behaves as I think it will – will move to MicroLED day 1.
But burnin – I think there’s a clear difference between any version of O-led (organic led) vs Led/Mini-led. The latter technology doesn’t contain degradable (by design) elements. So it will be more akin to display breakage, rather then burn-in per se.
I guess, we’ll see. As you say, depends also a lot on how Garmin will implement it.
My wish for better tech:
– Better run power integration within Garmin
– Better integration of CIQ within Garmin
– A Garmin arm HRM
a nice wish.
I wish for world peace, not sure who is most likely to get their wish 😉
tfk – Are you getting CIQ datafields bombing out on your 965? For the last few months, I am getting crashes regularly, doesn’t matter which CIQ it affects them all – never had that issue previously. Something in a recent FW hosed it up apparently.
nope
stryd, core, train.red are ones i use and all ok. at least as ok as they normally are
Thanks for confirming, wish I could figure out what is different about my device because it’s happening about every 3rd activity at this point. The only fix is to remove the CIQ field and then re-add it (while in activity).
@BrianTR – just an extra thought here. some of the DFs almost use up the memory limit by themselves eg Stryd. such DFs have difficulty working in the same profile as other DFs if they combine to exceed the memory limit.
I could confirm same crash (and fix) pattern here. I use Stryd and alphaHRV on an Enduro3. Approx 1 of 10 runs I observe the crashes of both IQ fields even with FW 12.34 which claims an IQ DF fix.
stryd almost maxes out the ciq memory limit.
Thanks for confirming, I’m getting roughly the same rate as you.
Nothing really exciting on the horizon, so I guess it’s a good time to buy something new in the Black Friday, with the reasonable expectation that it will stay relevant for the next 3 years. 👌
perhaps.
yes, i think we are at the end of the current wave of evolution of the components we know about, dual band gps, ohr/ecg, amoled, battery. they’ve mostly got to a point where they can’t improve too much more
the next wave is already starting and will progress over the years ahead: microLED, super sensing optical arrays, ssd batteries
Hey tfk! Have you noticed that Garmin has disabled Power Meters from the sensor pool on all Running activities on the latest FW release to the 965?
Stryd’s CIQ fields still work fine, but any other field that leverages the “native” power stream has been cut off as of this latest FW.
Here’s the link in Garmin’s 965 forum:
https://forums.garmin.com/sports-fitness/running-multisport/f/forerunner-965/397429/running-powermeter-connection-no-longer-working
hi
no i hadn’t noticed that, ty.
it’s probably a good thing though. stryd should be used by establishing a connection to it data field.
similarly this might stop wayward power numbers messing up garmin’s own running power (IDK, just speculating on that)
however it probably will mess up CIQ DFs/apps from 3rd parties other than stryd.