
Garmin Rolls Out November 2025 Smartwatch & Edge Feature Update
Garmin’s latest software update for its smartwatches and cycling computers began rolling out today. The free update provides key new features and improved functionality across a range of fitness and outdoor products.
Key New Features in This Release
New features are split between the latest cycling and watch products. I’ll comment on the omissions further below.
Health & Recovery
- Health Status: This feature monitors key health metrics—such as resting heart rate, HRV, and Pulse Ox—while you sleep to identify trends that move away from your baseline. These shifts could indicate increased stress from various factors, including activity levels, environmental factors, or potential illness.
Cycling & Performance (Edge Devices)
- Smart Fueling: Get real-time guidance during a ride on the recommended grams of carbohydrates and millilitres of water you should consume. Alerts are based on your current fitness, course demands, and environmental factors like heat and humidity.
- Power Guide Enhancements: When training with a power meter, Power Guide now manages your effort using recommended power targets that are adjusted for real-time stamina and wind. For mountain activities, the guide also considers your altitude acclimation.
- Real-Time Weather Updates: Monitor the weather mid-ride with radar and wind direction overlays. This requires your compatible smartphone and the Garmin Connect app.
- GroupRide Data Comparisons: An expansion of GroupRide functions that allows you to see your stats (e.g., speed, cadence, heart rate, power) compared to the group average during an active ride.
- Gear Ratio Analysis: When paired with electronic shifting, this feature lets you review the total time spent in each gear ratio after your ride.
Device Eligibility
The update covers a wide range of devices. Most core cycling features (Smart Fueling, Power Guide, etc.) are included in the Edge 550/850 feature back-port.
Health Status Feature Support
- On Watch & Garmin Connect App (Full Support):
- Fenix 8, Enduro 3, tactix 8, quatix 8, D2 Mach 2 series.
- Venu X1, Venu 4, D2 Air X15, vivoactive 6, and Forerunner 570/FR970 models.
- On Garmin Connect App Only:
- Venu 3, vivoactive 5, Forerunner 255/955/165/265/965 series.
- fēnix 7, tactix 7, quatix 7, epix (Gen 2), MARQ (Gen 2), fēnix 7 Pro, Enduro 2, Instinct E/3/Tactical series.
Summary
The most significant new features this quarter are those launched on the Venu 4 and Edge 550/850, then rolled across to other qualifying models. We can clearly see that expensive, relatively new models like Forerunner 965 and Fenix 7 Pro no longer qualify – customers have clearly had two years of use and now need to be encouraged to spend another $500-$1000 on a replacement watch!!
The features themselves are generally good, though the Gear Ratio analysis is probably of limited use.
As reported on this site, dcrainmaker, and elsewhere, the Health Status and Lifestyle Logging are Whoop catch-up features, albeit ones not implemented half as well. There’s a very good chance that Garmin is gunning towards a true Whoop competitor, rather than simply the Index Sleep smart Arm Band it released this year.
I particularly like the power, weather and fuelling improvements which should be helpful for quite a few of us at times. Perhaps less valuable are the Group Ride comparisons – I confess to not having tried these out yet, mainly because everyone I cycle with uses Wahoo! for those of you that do cycle in Garmin-heavy groups, I suspect the power stats will make interesting reading! Garmin’s GroupRide feature is probably one area the company will continue to expand over the coming years, perhaps ultimately becoming a more data-rich alternative to Strava.
Looking forward to 2026, there will be many feature surprises. Of those I’m pretty sure about, improvements to triathlon transition management and support for HYROX racing are top of the list.
Last Updated on 30 January 2026 by the5krunner

tfk is the founder and author of the5krunner, an independent endurance sports technology publication. With 20 years of hands-on testing of GPS watches and wearables, and competing in triathlons at an international age-group level, tfk provides in-depth expert analysis of fitness technology for serious athletes and endurance sport competitors.












No reason Health Status isn’t available on all the watches. The Instinct 3 isn’t that old, and has all the required telemetry. You’re already paying a Garmin premium, just give me access the the update algorithm already. What’s the Garmin premium? How about $200 for a scale that’s as accurate as one you can get for $50 (which for non-weight status isn’t very accurate), but doesn’t upload to the Garmin app.
It’s just a simple glance and the data summarized is surfaced from existing sleep, HRV, and resting HR stats tracked by the fenix 7 era watches. It’s a bit naff that they can’t be bothered to put the glance on the older generation firmware.
“data summarized is surfaced from existing sleep, HRV, and resting HR stats”
Correct. The article implies [*] that the health status feature itself monitors those stats, but as you said, all Heath Status actually does is identify deviations from baseline average ranges. All of these stats were collected and the baselines were calculated before Health Status ever existed. (For example you can already see your 7 day average resting HR and current baseline sleeping HRV range in other places.)
[*] “Health Status: This feature monitors key health metrics—such as resting heart rate, HRV, and Pulse Ox—while you sleep to identify trends that move away from your baseline. ”
“It’s a bit naff that they can’t be bothered to put the glance on the older generation firmware.”
I mean the reason they do this is always because they want you to buy a newer watch if you want that feature. It’s really as simple as that. I always see a lot of arguments (not specifically from you) that Garmin could “easily” bring some new feature to older watches if they wanted to. I would say that the cost is always non-zero (any software developer knows that even a “5 minute bug fix” comes with a ton of red tape, testing, etc. which balloons the true cost to be much higher than 5 minutes) and besides, Garmin doesn’t want to do it.
Btw, part of the cost of making any change at all is the possibility of breaking something that used to work – this happens with Garmin software all the time. (Yes, I know it happens to everyone.)
To be clear I am not defending or endorsing Garmin’s decisions. Just pointing out that there are obvious reasons for why they do what they do.
“It’s just a simple glance”
To be clear, only the newer gen watches (like FR970) are getting Health Status as both a glance and a page in the Connect app and website. Older gen watches (like FR955/FR965) – which are still supported via firmware updates – are only getting the page in Connect, but not the glance.
Again, it reflects the principle that users of older watches don’t get all the latest and greatest stuff.
The reason – as always – is Garmin wants you to buy a newer watch if you want this feature. I’m not defending or endorsing this behaviour, only pointing out reality.
I will never understand why some users seem to think:
– every product/feature decision must be made with only technical constraints in mind, and never marketing/business constraints
– it’s only “fair” to omit features which are physically incapable of being implemented on a given device due to *hardware* constraints. In other words, market segmentation via features is only “fair” is if it’s based on hardware differentiation, never due to “artificially” crippling software. By this reasoning, Garmin should bring a ton of new features to the 10 year old Forerunner 230, as long as they aren’t limited by hardware.
It’s funny because people don’t realize that hardware differences can also be seen as “artificial”, to a certain extent. When you buy a less expensive consumer version of a GPU, you may not realize that the super-expensive “studio” version is identical to the consumer version except for different drivers and maybe some trivial difference the board to identify it as the expensive model. It’s often possible to hack drivers to trick the consumer version into working like the studio version.
Also, when you by a slower, cheaper version of a CPU, you’re often buying what was actually a more expensive, faster CPU that failed certain quality control checks.
Finally, Garmin isn’t the only company that differentiates models via “artificial” software differences (although they probably do it to a greater extent than companies with a more modern business model, like Apple, who prefer to nickel and dime customers with a ton of subscriptions). Apple itself differentiates the Apple Watch Ultra with “Precision Start” for the Workouts app, which allows the user to select a sport (such as Run) and thereby enable GPS/HR without having activity recording automatically start after a countdown, but instead, the user gets to press a button to start the recording whenever they want (e.g. when they have a solid GPS lock). Users of non-ultra Apple Watches have to resort to other workarounds to get a solid fix before starting an activity recording, like opening a different app that uses GPS and waiting for a fix there. Of course “precision start” is laughably trivial for Garmin users, as Garmin has probably had this feature for longer than some Garmin users have been alive (or at least, longer than they’ve been using Garmins). And of course, Apple could “easily” bring Precision Start to non-Ultra Apple Watches, but guess what, they want to reserve that feature as selling point for the Ultra models.