
Garmin’s upcoming Fenix 4 is rumoured <here> to have a new and improved EXO-2 antennae. How does this development in the quest for Garmin’s GPS accuracy sit compared to the SPARTAN’s SirfStar V (SirfStar 5) chipset?
** FENIX 4 – Some hardware specs leaked HERE.
Certainly there seems to be a mixed bag of opinions on the SPARTAN’s GPS performance. Yet Suunto’s AMBIT PEAK and VERTICAL both used the same SirfStar V chipset – admittedly with a different antennae to the SPARTAN.
POINT 1: So there is hopefully at least some scope for Suunto to meet the expectations of GPS accuracy from AMBIT 3 upgraders.
FWIW my SPARTAN GPS experience (except OWS) has been generally very good, albeit in undemanding circumstances (documented on this site).
What about the Fenix 3/4?
New and improved hardware from Garmin sounds great.
POINT 2: Hopefully new hardware will deliver even better performance for Garmin F4 over the F3.
Garmin need to remember three things: testing, testing and, err I’ve forgotten the other one. Ah yes, TESTING.

Clearly GPS performance is not JUST about the hardware – also the antennae AND the firmware jiggery pokery that goes on around it all.
Last Updated on 16 January 2026 by the5krunner

tfk is the founder and author of the5krunner, an independent endurance sports technology publication. With 20 years of hands-on testing of GPS watches and wearables, and competing in triathlons at an international age-group level, tfk provides in-depth expert analysis of fitness technology for serious athletes and endurance sport competitors.

what the sirfstar gps chipset in suunto’s has to do with a new fenix antenna and a non sirfstar chipset in all recent garmins? just writing something to create buzz or bored?
bored, + snippet of info