I walked 9,000 steps with Garmin CIRQA, Fitbit Air and Apple Watch Ultra 4

Google Fitbit Air shown next to Whoop MG and Amazfit Helio Strap.JPG

I walked 9,000 steps, counted by hand, with the Garmin CIRQA, the Fitbit Air and the Apple Watch Ultra 4 to find out which is the most accurate step counter. All three finished within about 1% of the real number, and the two cheapest devices held their own against Apple’s flagship.

Two of these are screenless bands that cost a fraction of the Ultra 4. The Garmin CIRQA runs is Garmin Connect+ and uses your phone as its display, while the Fitbit Air is Google’s thin, low-cost tracker. If either can count steps as well as Apple’s most expensive watch, that matters to anyone buying a tracker mainly for daily activity.

I walked 9,000 steps with Garmin CIRQA vs Fitbit Air vs Apple Watch Ultra 4

Device Steps Difference Error
Fitbit Air 8,969 31 under 0.34%
Apple Watch Ultra 4 8,954 46 under 0.51%
Garmin CIRQA 9,096 96 over 1.07%
Actual (hand count) 9,000 – –

Whoop MG was 8387, but I excluded it because it missed several minutes of recording. Although I counted 9000 steps, I probably miscounted by 10-20. The Fitbit and Garmin were worn on the same wrist, so there is no reason for them to be different other than the devices’ sensors and algorithms.

Manual reference 9000 steps Garmin CIRQA 9096 Fitbit Air 8969 Apple Watch Ultra 8954 Closest to manual count Fitbit Air

1. Fitbit Air’s step count is closest

The Fitbit Air came closest, 31 steps short of my count, an error of a third of one per cent. For a band with no screen at this price, that is an excellent result, and it shows Google’s step algorithm is as good on its cheapest hardware as anywhere else.

2. Apple Watch Ultra 4 is a close second

The Apple Watch Ultra 4 is undercounted by 46 steps, half a percent. That is also excellent, and the gap between it and the Fitbit Air is only 15 steps over 9,000. On a different walk, the order could easily swap.

3. Garmin CIRQA overcounts, but only just

The Garmin CIRQA was the only device to overcount, adding 96 steps, or about 1%. I treat anything within 100 steps on a walk of this length as accurate, so the CIRQA still passes, but it is the one result that sits at the edge of that range.

Garmin CIRQA and Fitbit Air on my right wrist

4. My hand count has an error too

Counting 9,000 steps by hand is not perfect. Lose concentration for a moment, and you can be out by 20 or 30 steps either way, so the gap between the Fitbit Air and the Apple Watch Ultra 4 is inside my own margin of error. What the test does show clearly is that all three are within about 1%, and that the two wrist devices that undercounted did so by a similar amount.

5. Price does not buy step accuracy

A screenless tracker matched Apple’s most expensive watch on the most basic measure of daily activity. If steps are what you care about, the Fitbit Air or Garmin CIRQA does the job for far less money. The Apple Watch Ultra 4 earns its price elsewhere, in its screen, apps, dual-band GPS and battery life, not in counting steps. If you are choosing between Google’s two bands, Fitbit Edge vs Fitbit Air covers the differences.

6. Devices Used

I updated each device to the latest firmware before setting off. CIRQA was v4.2, Apple Watch was 27.3beta, and Air was v20001.253.2

The Fitbit Air band was by dbrand – the only 3rd-party band to be found on the Google Store.

The winner

The Fitbit Air wins this step count test by the narrowest of margins, with the Apple Watch Ultra 4 a close second and the Garmin CIRQA a respectable third. In practice, all three are accurate enough that step count alone should not decide which one you buy.

Quick answers

Which is the most accurate step counter: Garmin CIRQA, Fitbit Air or Apple Watch Ultra 4?
On my 9,000-step walk, the Fitbit Air was closest at 31 steps under, the Apple Watch Ultra 4 was 46 under and the Garmin CIRQA was 96 over. All three were within about 1% of the actual count.

Does the Garmin CIRQA count steps accurately?
Yes. It overcounted by 96 steps on a 9,000-step walk, about 1%, which is within the range I treat as accurate for a walk of this length.

Is the Fitbit Air as accurate as an Apple Watch?
For steps, yes. It came within 31 steps of my hand count, slightly closer than the Apple Watch Ultra 4, though the gap is smaller than the error in counting by hand.

Last Updated on 13 November 2026 by tfk the5krunner


Small things I always use

Health, recovery and sleep

  • Kineon MOVE+: Red and infrared light for sore knees, Achilles and other joints after hard training. I use it.
  • FreeStyle Libre 3 Plus: Shows how my blood sugar responds to diet. Occasional use.
  • hDrop: Measures my sweat loss in summer and indoors. I use it.
  • Fourth Frontier Zone: Checks my heart under load in hard sessions.
  • Oura Ring 5: My partner’s recovery tracker of choice.
  • Eight Sleep: A cooling mattress cover my partner and I use nightly.

Watches and sensors

On the bike

Home and indoor training

  • NPE Runn: Makes my basic treadmill smart, sending more accurate speed and distance to my watch and Zwift. I use it.
  • Google Wifi: Keeps Zwift connected in my pain cave. I use it.
  • Apple TV 4K: Zwift on the big screen. I use two.
  • Google Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen): My video doorbell, running in both Google Home and Apple Home via Starling. I use it.


Reader-Powered Content

Buy me a coffee

This content is not sponsored. It’s mostly me behind the labour of love, which is this site, and I appreciate everyone who supports it.

Support the site: Follow (free, fewer ads) · Subscribe (paid, ad-free) · Buy Me A Coffee

Written by real people, with AI assistance. Fact-checked and verified for originality. See the Editorial Policy. FTC: Affiliate Disclosure — some links pay commission. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *